Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao has introduced a new set of voluntary guidance for self-driving cars

Chao said the Department of Transportation is already working on version three of the guidance, which will be released in 2018.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao
U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao
Win McNamee / Getty

U.S. DOT secretary Elaine Chao just introduced the second version of voluntary guidance for the deployment and testing of self-driving cars.

Chao, who spoke in Michigan, said this framework will continue to be updated and that the DOT is already working on the third version, with plans to introduce the new guidance in 2018.

Under Secretary Anthony Foxx, the DOT put out the first version of this guidance in September 2016. Those guidelines were introduced with the intention of being updated. At the time, many stakeholders were pleased with the progress the federal government was making on self-driving cars, though some still felt the guidance was incomplete.

Automakers and other players, for instance, wanted the DOT to be clearer about the roles that the states and the federal government played in regulating autonomous vehicles. This would determine whether there was a patchwork of state regulations across the U.S. which would inevitably make self-driving deployment much more difficult.

Version 2.0, as Chao called it, addresses that in a bit more detail. For instance, some states have proposed laws that would limit testing of self-driving cars to established automakers. But this guidance recommends against that.

States should not place unnecessary burdens on competition and innovation by limiting ADS testing or deployment to motor vehicle manufacturers only. For example, no data suggests that experience in vehicle manufacturing is an indicator of the ability to safely test or deploy vehicle technology. All entities that meet Federal and State law prerequisites for testing or deployment should have the ability to operate in the State.

In a statement, a General Motors spokesperson calls the guidelines “clear, streamlined, and flexible” and applauded the clarity around state and federal roles.

“In issuing the new guidance and policy framework, NHTSA and DOT have been very responsive to the concerns and suggestions of stakeholders, while appropriately maintaining safety as the paramount goal,” the spokesperson said. “In particular, General Motors appreciates DOT’s clarification of the separate roles of federal and state governments in regulating self-driving vehicles and its guidance for state policymakers.”

This isn’t the only movement on the self-driving regulation front. Last week, the House of Representatives passed a bill that would allow for the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles. That bill will now have to get through the Senate where Sen. John Thune, R-S.D. has circulated a separate draft self-driving bill.

Related

Until either of those bills actually pass and become law, the guidance serves as a placeholder that serves to set up a voluntary framework for states to adhere to.

The Self-Driving Coalition for Safer Streets, which represents Google, Uber, Lyft, Volvo and Ford, said it was pleased with the DOT’s continued work on autonomous regulations.

“With more than 35,000 motor vehicle deaths in 2015, the potential safety benefits of fully self-driving technology are too important to delay,” former administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and coalition general counsel David Strickland said. “We look forward to continue working with Secretary Chao, NHTSA and Congress in pursuit of the right policy solutions to make self-driving technology’s safety and mobility efforts a reality.”

Here is the full guidance:

Self-driving guidance by Johana Bhuiyan on Scribd


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel