Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A top European Union official is planning to press Apple, Facebook and others this week on privacy and hate speech

Věra Jourová, an EU commissioner, is paying the Valley a visit.

A row of European Union flags that are blue with a circle of gold stars, in front of an office building
A row of European Union flags that are blue with a circle of gold stars, in front of an office building
Carl Court/Getty Images

One of the European Union’s leading regulators is making a house call to Silicon Valley this week. Her agenda: A series of meetings with the likes of Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg to press the tech industry on privacy, hate speech and consumer protection.

The visit beginning today by Věra Jourová, the EU commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, comes at a time when Brussels increasingly is the cop on the beat overseeing the U.S. tech industry, which often has escaped the strongest regulation from its own government in Washington, D.C.

At the top of Jourová’s list is the future of a transatlantic trade pact that allows tech companies to store Europeans’ data in the United States. The agreement, called the Privacy Shield, exists to bridge the gap between the U.S. and EU governments’ different approaches to privacy protection — and the deal is up for its first annual review this week.

The likes of Facebook, Google and Microsoft stress the agreement is essential for the day-to-day functions of their products and services, as have top White House officials. Together, they fought to secure its implementation beginning in 2015, after concerns about the U.S. government’s lax privacy laws led an EU court to invalidate their last data-transfer pact.

For her part, Jourová exited the meeting with key Trump administration officials saying she “had a very strong feeling that we are on one page, the same page, as for the goals” of the Privacy Shield. But she did express a few doubts — including the fact that the U.S. government had yet to appoint an ombudsman for the trade agreement. That official is supposed to handle complaints from EU citizens who fear their data has been handled inappropriately by the United States.

“I’m sure we will insist on having people in those places as soon as possible,” she said of a forthcoming EU report on implementation.

As part of a review of the Privacy Shield, Jourová’s meetings will take her to Apple, Facebook, Google and Palantir, she told Recode. With web companies in particular, they’ll also hear an earful about the EU’s work to crack down on everything from copyright infringement to hate speech.

To that end, the Commission is expected to produce a policy paper in September studying those issues as well as other forms of illegal content, including terrorist messaging and child pornography. The process, Jourová said, would determine “whether we will come with more strict rules, or whether we will continue working with the IT sector.”

On hate speech, in particular, the EU has already pressed Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and Google to add more staff and improve their technology so they can spot offending content identified by European governments and take it down in the course of 24 hours. Over the past year, those companies have sped up their response times, a recent EU report has found — though Twitter still has faced criticism for being too slow.

Absent more improvements, Jourová stressed that the EU could seek binding regulation of hate speech — rules that would apply beyond the four companies currently working with Brussels on the issue.

“We made clear that if we do not see better action we will have to come with maybe harder solutions in the EU — hard in the [sense] of regulation,” she said.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel