Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump: Maybe we’ll end all trade with countries that trade with North Korea. Everyone: Huh?

That would mean ending all US trade with China and causing major economic turmoil.

NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

In the wake of North Korea’s test of its most powerful nuclear bomb yet on Sunday, President Donald Trump has made another vague, ominous threat on Twitter.

But this time, it’s about economics rather than “fire and fury”:

This threat to stop all trade with countries doing business with North Korea seems to be directed at China. North Korea relies on China for about 90 percent of its foreign trade, as my colleague Zeeshan Aleem recently wrote. Furthermore, Trump has repeatedly complained that China hasn’t done enough to “help” with the North Korea problem.

But the threat that the US would stop “all trade” with China seems laughably implausible. The US and China engage in hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of trade each year, and “stopping” this would cause massive turmoil in the US economy (as well as, of course, in the global economy).

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin used an appearance on Fox News Sunday to frame the proposal in terms of working with China to toughen sanctions on the Kim regime, and not in terms of trying to punish Beijing.

“I’m going to draft a sanctions package to send to the president for his strong consideration, that anybody that wants to do trade or business with them would be prevented from doing trade or business with us,” Mnuchin said. But he added right afterward: “We are going to work with our allies. We’ll work with China.”

Mnuchin continued: “We work with China and others. China has a lot of trade with them. There’s a lot we can do to cut them off economically, much more than we’ve done already.”

So despite the president’s sweeping language, what is probably more likely to materialize in the end is some marginal toughening of existing sanctions, sold with tough talk. If true, that would reveal Trump’s rhetoric to be rather empty, but it would be a better outcome than a trade war.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters