Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump is proposing the “nuclear option” on the government shutdown. It makes no sense.

7 thoughts about Trump’s suggestion to change Senate rules to avert shutdown.

It’s the second day of the government shutdown and President Donald Trump is already pushing the “nuclear option.” In this case, it’s an option that probably wouldn’t solve anything.

Over Twitter Sunday morning, Trump advised Republican leaders to make a historic change to Senate rules and pass a partisan government spending bill with only 51 votes. A spending bill has always needed 60 votes to pass the Senate, which, given the makeup of the current Congress, requires bipartisan support.

The government spending deadline elapsed at midnight Friday, and Democrats and Republicans are still deep in a standoff over the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which Trump has promised to sunset fully by March 5.

Frustrated with Trump’s inability to keep to his word on immigration negotiations, Democrats walked away from a short-term government spending bill that would have kept the government open for four more weeks and funded the Children’s Health Insurance Program for six years — something that Democrats have been calling for since the program’s funding lapsed last October — because it did not include a path forward on DACA.

A few thoughts on Trump’s nuclear proposal:

  1. On Friday, the four-week spending bill failed with both Democrat and Republican defections. Four Republicans voted against the proposal. It’s not even clear at this point if a partisan spending bill could pass the Senate.
  2. Not to mention that Trump is suggesting Congress pass a permanent spending package — the legislative language for which doesn’t even exist.
  3. The only proposal currently on the table is a Republican offer to shorten the short-term spending bill to three weeks instead of four, heeding to only part of Democrats’ demands. That counter would not include any agreement on immigration.
  4. There is no push from anyone in either chamber to put forward a major bill instead of buying time to negotiate with a stopgap. Given all the barriers involved — from writing a package to getting support for it — there’s simply no way a big spending deal would get done faster and reopen the government sooner. There’s also no appetite to change Senate rules. “The Republican Conference opposes changing the rules on legislation,” David Popp, spokesperson for Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, told USA Today.
  5. By Saturday night, negotiations on immigration and to reopen the government still hadn’t progressed. Senators left the Hill after another late night with little to show for it.
  6. Sunday at 1 pm, they return. McConnell has scheduled a vote on a new spending plan by 1 am Monday or sooner. It’s still not clear what the Senate will vote on then.
  7. At this point, negotiations need to slide toward common ground. But instead, Trump has again escalated partisan rancor. His latest “nuclear” suggestion would not only indicate the ultimate failure in negotiation but fundamentally alter the way the country is governed. It probably wouldn’t even work.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters