Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Did the CIA, NSA, or anyone else have intel that an attack was coming?

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s January 2014 bipartisan review found there was no warning.

Late US Senator John McCain(R) (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham(c) (R-SC), and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) during a press conference November 14, 2012 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC regarding the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.
Late US Senator John McCain(R) (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham(c) (R-SC), and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) during a press conference November 14, 2012 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC regarding the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.
Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images
Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy, The Reactionary Spirit, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here.

The short answer is no. The long answer is also no, but they definitely saw warning signs that US personnel in Benghazi were at general risk.

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s January 2014 bipartisan review, one of the most comprehensive report on Benghazi to date, concluded that “there was no singular tactical warning in the intelligence reporting leading up to the events on September 11, 2012, predicting an attack on US facilities in Benghazi on the 9/11 anniversary.” In other words, there was no intel warning the US that an attack on its diplomatic mission was in the works.

However, there were hundreds of more general intelligence reports — from the CIA, DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), and Pentagon Joint Staff — warning that Islamist groups in Libya were ready and willing to hit US targets. Ambassador Stevens himself wrote several notes to higher-ups at the State Department to ask for more security support in Benghazi — which he never got. And there were also some more obvious signs of terrorist activity, like a RPG attack on the British Ambassador’s convoy in Benghazi exactly three months before the attack on the mission.

As a consequence of this threatening environment, the CIA made a number of (classified) security upgrades to its own separate facility in another part Benghazi, usually called the CIA annex. The State Department mailed the mission staff some new security cameras, but didn’t send over anyone to install them.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff