Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Who were the Benghazi attackers?

They were members of various anti-American jihadi groups based in and around Benghazi, according to the CIA, possibly including ringleader is Ahmed Abu Khattala.

This Oct. 2, 2017, file courtroom sketch depicts Benghazi suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala listening to a interpreter through earphones during the opening statement by assistant U.S. attorney John Crabb, second from left, at federal court in Washington
This Oct. 2, 2017, file courtroom sketch depicts Benghazi suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala listening to a interpreter through earphones during the opening statement by assistant U.S. attorney John Crabb, second from left, at federal court in Washington
This Oct. 2, 2017, file courtroom sketch depicts Benghazi suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala listening to a interpreter through earphones during the opening statement by assistant U.S. attorney John Crabb, second from left, at federal court in Washington
AP Images/Dana Verkouteren
Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy, The Reactionary Spirit, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here.

Members of various anti-American jihadi groups based in and around Benghazi, according to CIA intelligence. One possible ringleader is Ahmed Abu Khattala, a deeply violent militia leader with ties to more radical Benghazi organizations. Khattala denies culpability for the attack, he’s been indicted by a federal jury on charges of helping plan and organize the attack. Since no one group is claiming responsibility, it’s hard to know for sure what the motivation for the attack was beyond a general jihadi objective of killing Americans.

There’s no real evidence as yet that any of these groups planned the attack in advance — in other words, it appears to have been largely spontaneous. In tactical terms, the initial attack on the mission wasn’t that complicated — a bunch of guys with easy access to light weapons hit a poorly guarded American target.

The US intelligence community now believes the attack was primarily an alliance of opportunity between some militants, rather than a pre-planned offensive. “The nature of the attacks suggested they did not involve significant pre-planning,” then-acting CIA Director Michael Morell wrote to Sen. Dianne Feinstein on January 4th, 2013, summing up the consensus among US intel agencies.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff