Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Michael Cohen’s guilty plea proves the House GOP’s Russia investigation was a sham

Republicans didn’t have all the facts. They ended the probe anyway.

Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a glass of champagne during a lunch during the 2014 Sochi Paralympic Games on March 13, 2014.
Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a glass of champagne during a lunch during the 2014 Sochi Paralympic Games on March 13, 2014.
Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a glass of champagne during a lunch during the 2014 Sochi Paralympic Games on March 13, 2014.
Harry Engels/Getty Images

Michael Cohen’s guilty plea on Thursday is the strongest evidence yet that House Republicans’ probe into possible Trump-Russia collusion was nothing more than a partisan sham.

Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and fixer, admitted he lied to Congress about President Donald Trump’s efforts to develop a Trump Tower in Moscow while campaigning deep into 2016. It calls into question just how much Republican investigators on the House Intelligence Committee really cared about corroborating what they were told by people in Trump’s inner circle.

In March, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) — who led the House GOP effort — told reporters “we’ve found no evidence of collusion,” adding that there was “perhaps some bad judgment, inappropriate meetings, inappropriate judgment at taking meetings,” but nothing that amounted to a coordinated and deliberate effort to work with Russians to win the White House.

We now know the panel reached a conclusion without knowing all the facts. Cohen didn’t offer any evidence for collusion, but his newest revelation underscores how little the GOP-led panel aimed to learn the true extent of Trump-Russia ties.

“The committee was likely lied to about the Moscow project,” Andy Wright, a former White House lawyer, told me. The committee’s Republican leadership “refused to test the veracity of Trump aides’ and family members’ testimony by blocking any efforts to compel the relevant documents and communications records,” he added.

Indeed, Republicans mainly issued subpoenas against the Department of Justice and government officials they suspected of conspiring against Trump. They did little to see if there was any conspiracy on the part of Trump or people connected to him.

Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee continue to note that their Republican counterparts never interviewed key witnesses including former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort, and Manafort’s associate Rick Gates — all of whom have now pleaded guilty in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

Still, committee Republicans feel their job is complete. Asked by CNN if they shut down the probe too early, panel member Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio said “absolutely not.”

“We had gotten to the point where either we would be interfering in the Mueller investigation,” he continued, “or we were getting redundant information. I think the special counsel is where this investigation should be.”

Vox reached out to Conaway’s office for comment on why he ended the probe, but they didn’t immediately return our request.

Incoming Democrats will be much tougher on Trump

Democrats remain apoplectic over how Republicans handled the probe. But they will now be in a position restart the investigation when they become the majority party in the House in January.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who is widely expected to lead the House Intelligence Committee in the next Congress, told me the way Republicans bought what Cohen first told them is “absurd” and vowed to gather more information from others in Trump’s orbit.

“There are several witnesses we have concerns about,” Schiff said. He specifically mentioned Roger Stone, the notorious political trickster whose ties to WikiLeaks and possible involvement in the release of emails damaging to Hillary Clinton during the presidential campaign is currently a focus of Mueller’s investigation.

It’s unclear if Democrats will find anything else that Republicans didn’t, and surely Mueller can obtain more information than the House committee can ever find. But the point is that the probe should still be open — not closed prematurely to protect Trump.

Committee Republicans “short-circuited the Russia investigation in order to shield the president,” Wright told me.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters