Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump now says the US loses $200 billion on illegal immigration every year. That’s not true.

Another day, another Trump tweet featuring a loose interpretation of numbers.

So where did Trump get that number?
So where did Trump get that number?
So where did Trump get that number?
Ralf Hirschberger/Picture Alliance/Getty Images

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump tweeted (without evidence) that “illegal immigration costs the United States more than 200 Billion Dollars a year.”

But two weeks ago, Trump was tweeting that “our Country loses 250 Billion Dollars a year on illegal immigration” and added that “Top Border Security … Pays for itself.”

Setting aside memories of Trump repeatedly promising — even as recently as August — that Mexico would pay for the border wall, much of the focus on that tweet from journalists and others centered on that $250 billion number. Namely, where on earth did that number come from, and what happened in two weeks that shifted that number down to $200 billion?

Some possible sources, from immigration restrictionists to (maybe) the White House?

President Trump’s use of numbers in his public statements and tweets has always been somewhat arbitrary. As Toronto Star reporter Daniel Dale, who fact-checks every single one of Trump’s public statements, put it in November, “If Trump cites any number at all, the real number is usually smaller.”

The $250 billion referenced in his tweet is a prime example, because in August 2016, Trump said during an Arizona speech that “illegal immigration costs our country more than $113 billion a year.” In Trump’s tweet from two weeks ago, he somehow more than doubled that number in two years, despite an overall downward trend in undocumented immigrants crossing the border, and then reduced that number by $50 billion for no apparent reason.

(I reached out to the White House and to the Department of Homeland Security for a source for the $250 billion number but have not yet heard back.)

In 2016, the source that Trump may have been referencing was a report by the Federation for American Immigration Reform, an organization that supports restrictions on immigration. That report, first published in 2013 and then updated last year, estimated that in 2013, the net cost of illegal immigration — which includes federal, local, and state taxes paid by undocumented immigrants — was $113 billion. In 2017, that number had increased, in FAIR’s estimation, to $115.8 billion. It’s worth noting that FAIR estimated that roughly 12.5 million undocumented immigrants are living in the United States, which is well above other estimates, like those of the Pew Research Center.

But $115 billion is notably not $250 billion, nor is it $200 billion. So where did Trump get these numbers? Perhaps from the White House website.

There’s a page on the site titled “It’s Time to End Chain Migration,” where the Trump administration laid out its opposition to family-based migration in December 2017. (For more on this issue, please read my colleague Dara Lind’s summary on how “chain migration” works.)

On that page, there is a graphic that argues “current immigration policy” is costing the United States $300 billion per year.

A graphic from a page titled “It’s Time to End Chain Migration,” December 2017.
A graphic from a page titled “It’s Time to End Chain Migration,” December 2017.
WhiteHouse.gov

That number may have come from a 2016 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. According to a Washington Times article on that report, “Immigration drains the government, sapping as much as $296 billion a year from federal, state and local taxpayers while depressing wages, at least in the short run.”

The report also notes, “An immigrant and a native-born person with similar characteristics will likely have about the same fiscal impact.” In a PolitiFact interview with one of the report’s contributors, Gretchen Donehower of the University of California Berkeley, she said, “To characterize that one number” — $296 billion — “as the cost to current native-born taxpayers, is absolutely a case of cherry-picking one result out of a very detailed report.” And to be absolutely clear, that $296 billion number isn’t referring to just illegal immigration but to immigration, period, both legal and illegal.

And $296 billion “lost” on all forms of immigration to the United States still isn’t $250 billion lost on illegal immigration. And it’s not $200 billion lost on illegal immigration. And it’s not $113 billion lost on illegal immigration.

The search continues, again.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters