Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook has suspended hundreds of apps in its effort to uncover another Cambridge Analytica

Thousands of apps have been reviewed, and 200 have been suspended pending further review.

Facebook is on the hunt for other Cambridge Analytica-type bad actors: Developers who had access to Facebook user data and employed it in a way that violates the company’s guidelines.

On Monday, Facebook offered an update to that hunt: The company says it has reviewed “thousands of apps” with access to Facebook user data and suspended 200 of them “pending a thorough investigation into whether they did in fact misuse any data.”

That doesn’t mean there are 200 more Cambridge Analytica-type scenarios out there. It just means that there are 200 other apps Facebook wants to take a closer look at. It’s possible they will all be cleared of any wrongdoing. It’s possible many of them will not.

It’s also possible that this number will grow. A company spokesperson told Recode that Facebook is still very early on in the audit process. That means Facebook plans to investigate thousands more apps on top of the thousands the company has already looked at. It’s highly likely that there will be more potential offenders that Facebook decides to suspend.

“Where we find evidence that these or other apps did misuse data, we will ban them and notify people via this website,” Facebook wrote in a blog post Monday, linking to the same site it used to alert people if their data was shared with Cambridge Analytica.

Facebook has been sharing user data with apps for years. It’s one of the core ways Facebook grew, especially in its early days. The problem with this audit is that no matter what Facebook finds, it’s going to be too late. Facebook can ban bad actors, but once the data leaves Facebook’s servers, there isn’t much the company can do to get it back.

Same thing goes for user trust. If Facebook finds a bunch of other Cambridge-Analytica type scenarios played out over the past few years, it’ll be tough to convince anybody that Facebook can take care of user privacy moving forward.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel