Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A pro-abortion rights group is asking candidates if they’ve been accused of sexual harassment

It’s a question a Massachusetts NARAL PAC is posing before offering its endorsement.

March Supporting Sexual Assault Victims Held In Los Angeles
March Supporting Sexual Assault Victims Held In Los Angeles
Demonstrators participate in a #MeToo march in Los Angeles, California.
Photo by David McNew/Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

If state candidates in Massachusetts want an endorsement from a women’s rights PAC, they’ll have to say whether they’ve ever been accused of sexual harassment.

The #MeToo conversation about sexual harassment has roiled Capitol Hill and led to the resignations of lawmakers including Blake Farenthold, John Conyers, and Al Franken. The questionnaire, from NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts, signals that some progressive groups want to hold politicians to a high standard — even if the 2016 presidential results suggest voters aren’t always deterred by accusations of sexual harassment.

“Have you ever been formally accused of sexual harassment?” the candidate questionnaire asks. “If so, please explain.”

Questionnaires are common for groups trying to find out more about candidates’ backgrounds and policy positions, but this is thought to be the first time an interest group has asked candidates about allegations of sexual harassment for them to secure an endorsement, according to the Boston Globe’s Stephanie Ebbert.

Since Franken’s resignation, a bigger debate has played out among Democrats about whether there’s a double standard in how seriously the two parties take sexual misconduct. Some Democrats argued that Franken had been railroaded and that the complaints should have been fully investigated. But the NARAL questionnaire suggests liberal groups want their party’s candidates to take harassment accusations against them seriously.

A “yes” on the questionnaire might not be disqualifying

NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts has said it plans to keep the information it receives confidential and emphasized that saying “yes” might not be disqualifying, although operatives have expressed their skepticism about the likelihood of keeping such details under wraps.

“We believe that as we work to shift the culture, some of our critical allies in this fight must include people who have recognized that they have behaved inappropriately in the past and have a clear track record of changing their behavior and creating safe work environments for all,” Rebecca Hart Holder, the executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts, told the Globe.

Still, political operatives told the Globe that they’d advise candidates who had been accused in the past to skip the questionnaire entirely: The one scenario in which a candidate could safely divulge his case, they said, is the one that has already been reported.

More than half of men and over 60 percent of women have said that sexual harassment is an extremely or very important issue as they weigh their vote for Congress this year, according to a poll from CNN. When broken out by party affiliation, that number is even higher for Democrats — with 80 percent indicating that sexual harassment is an extremely or very important issue as they head to the ballot box, compared with 38 percent of Republicans.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters