Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The three reasons Spotify did a rare direct stock listing, according to CEO Daniel Ek

It’s all about transparency.

When Spotify listed its shares on the New York Stock Exchange this February, it did so with a rare, daring, direct listing, which cut out much of the traditional banking infrastructure that powers most IPOs. And it worked!

Why did the Swedish music streaming service do it that way? As Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Ek explained tonight at Code Conference in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif., there were three main reasons:

  1. Transparency. “One thing about the traditional process — which was done in the 1970s — is obviously the world has changed a lot,” Ek said. “It just didn’t sit well with me to put out this document in this day and era when information is [fingersnap] like this and you can’t comment on it, you can’t say anything about it until the moment where you ring the bell and go public. I wanted to see if there was a way to push more transparency so that we could actually be open and could tell the story much differently.”
  2. Equal access to information for prospective shareholders. In theory, Ek explained, everyone should have the same information. “What actually happens in practice is you do this quiet road show and give some people a little bit more information, and then you open the doors and hope that those people will then hold your stock. And I didn’t want to do that. I wanted everyone to have exactly the same information.”
  3. Ek didn’t want to put anyone in a different boat. “Most often what happens is that the investors get to sell early on; the employees do not. I did not want that at all. I wanted everyone to have the same opportunity to sell — or buy, by the way — Day One.”

Sure, it was risky. “But we had a lot of data,” he said, “and we had a pretty strong indication where it was going.

“Overall, I would say, even if it would have been more volatile in the beginning, I don’t think it would have changed our decision. We’re trying to build something where we care about where the value will go long term, not what the stock will trade Day One.”

Watch Ek’s full interview with Kara Swisher and Peter Kafka below.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel