Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

AT&T can buy Time Warner, and everyone else can buy everything else

No conditions, no restraints. A victory for mergermania, and a loss for the Trump administration.

AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson
Asa Mathat
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Verizon? Go right ahead. Charter? You, too. Amazon and other tech companies with billions to burn? Go for it.

That’s the message from a federal judge, who has ruled today that AT&T can buy Time Warner — and, crucially, didn’t apply any restrictions to his decision.

That clears the way for other “vertical” mergers, which means other people who control distribution — cable guys, telco guys, tech guys — can buy content guys.

So, again, take a last look at this chart:

Image of the media landscape, updated June 11

Because it’s going to be a collector’s item.

For starters, Comcast*, which has already said it was going to bid on the 21st Century Fox assets Disney already plans to buy, is definitely going to make that bid.

The Murdoch family has said they’d prefer the Disney bid for multiple reasons, including the fact that it was more likely to pass regulatory muster. Now Comcast, which owns both a distribution business and a content business, can reasonably argue that it will be easier for a Comcast/Fox deal to get approved.

Other obvious potential buyers include Charter, the second-biggest pay TV distributor in the U.S., and Verizon, which has already looked at buying CBS, per CBS’s legal team.

The Department of Justice can appeal Judge Richard Leon’s decision, and could conceivably ask for an injunction that would stop the deal from closing before a June 20 deadline.

But Leon went out of his way to argue against a stay, and hinted at the notion that the reason the case existed in the first place was to please Donald Trump, who campaigned against the deal as a presidential candidate, and has continued to rail against Time Warner’s CNN since taking office.

“There is a grave and understandable fear on the part of the defendants that the government will now seek to do indirectly what it couldn’t accomplish by seeking a stay,” he wrote. “I hope and trust that the Government will have the good judgement, wisdom and courage to avoid such a manifest injustice. To do so otherwise, I fear, would undermine the faith in our system of justice of not only the defendants, but their millions of shareholders and the business community at large.”

Here’s AT&T’s official statement:

“We are pleased that, after conducting a full and fair trial on the merits, the Court has categorically rejected the government’s lawsuit to block our merger with Time Warner. We thank the Court for its thorough and timely examination of the evidence, and we compliment our colleagues at the Department of Justice on their dedicated representation of the government. We look forward to closing the merger on or before June 20 so we can begin to give consumers video entertainment that is more affordable, mobile, and innovative.”

And from the DOJ, via Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, who filed the case against AT&T:

”We continue to believe that the pay-TV market will be less competitive and less innovative as a result of the proposed merger between AT&T and Time Warner. We will closely review the Court’s opinion and consider next steps in light of our commitment to preserving competition for the benefit of American consumers.”

Read the full decision below.

* Comcast is an investor in Vox Media, which owns this site.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel