Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The House is voting on immigration Thursday. No one seems to know what’s going on.

House Republicans didn’t know what was in their “compromise” immigration bill the day before the vote.

House Speaker Paul Ryan Holds Weekly Press Conference At The Capitol
House Speaker Paul Ryan Holds Weekly Press Conference At The Capitol
Nobody knows what’s going to happen on immigration in the House Thursday.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

House Republicans are in a state of chaos over immigration.

Lawmakers are slated to take two votes on Republican-led immigration bills on Thursday: a “compromise” bill between House conservatives and moderate Republicans, and a conservative bill originally introduced by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA). Neither proposal has been designed to get any Democratic votes.

But by Wednesday afternoon, conservative Freedom Caucus chair Rep. Mark Meadow (R-NC) came out of a heated debate with House Speaker Paul Ryan and declared the compromise immigration bill was not “ready for primetime.” The Freedom Caucus controls enough votes to tank either bill.

The dispute, Meadows said, was over certain provisions — which he would not specify — that he was told would be in the bill but weren’t.

“I don’t care anymore,” Meadows said angrily in his final words to Ryan on the floor. “It doesn’t matter anymore.”

As House Republicans head toward a vote on immigration — one that has been underscored by an emotional national debate over the family separation border issue — it’s unclear if they’ll be able to pass anything. It’s even possible the vote won’t happen at all.

House Republicans are confused about what’s going on

Republican lawmakers are confused about which two bills will even be getting a vote in the first place.

The “compromise” bill would offer legal status for young unauthorized immigrants known as DREAMers and a path to citizenship for some, based on merit; direct billions of dollars toward a southern border wall; make cuts to legal immigration; and make it harder to seek asylum. The Goodlatte bill makes deeper cuts to legal immigration and doesn’t offer a path to citizenship for DREAMers.

But on Wednesday afternoon, Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), who is a member of the Republican whip team, came out of a meeting with House Republicans and told reporters there are three possible immigration bills, two of which could get votes Thursday — a sentiment that was echoed by several other Republican lawmakers in interviews with Vox. But House leadership said there are only two.

The confusion seemed to be rooted in the fact that Goodlatte is sponsoring both bills, leading some lawmakers to believe there are two conservative proposals and a third consensus bill with moderates.

“Believe me ... there’s a bunch of us in there that have got this same issue,” Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX) told Vox. “But we have got to vote on it.”

Republicans appear to be preparing for both immigration bills to fail

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen paid House Republicans a visit Wednesday after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to halt family separations at the border — the direct result of the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy on detaining migrants. (Vox’s Dara Lind has an analysis of the executive order here.)

House Republicans were not briefed about the order in advance, but many welcomed the breathing room on the subject. But there’s also a sense that the administration’s order might dampen the urgency among Republicans to vote for a more comprehensive immigration bill.

Meanwhile, the administration hasn’t been particularly forceful on what it wants to see Congress do. In a meeting with the entire House Republican conference earlier this week, Trump told lawmakers he supported both the conservative proposal and the Republican consensus bill negotiated between various factions of the Republican Party. Trump met with a group of roughly 17 House Republicans again on Wednesday to gauge support — a meeting that swayed some lawmakers but not all in the room.

Members of the Freedom Caucus and other House conservatives seemed to still be finding issues with the final product.

Rep. Lou Barletta (R-PA) said he told the president that he would be voting against the compromise bill at the Wednesday meeting, saying it provided amnesty to DREAMers’ parents. The current bill allows DREAMers who have become citizens to apply for green cards for their parents.

Outside conservative groups, like the Heritage Foundation think tank, have told members to vote against the compromise bill.

Ryan has said he will call up a vote on both bills regardless of their chances of passing. His message is clear: This is Republicans’ last chance to actually vote and pass an immigration overhaul out of the House before the midterm elections.

But on Wednesday, even the prospect of a vote wasn’t a certainty.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters