Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The White House statement on the Mueller indictments had a glaring omission

It didn’t condemn Russia at all.

Mueller Testifies At Senate FBI Oversight Hearing
Mueller Testifies At Senate FBI Oversight Hearing
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

The White House’s reaction to special counsel Robert Mueller’s indictments of 12 Russian spies on Friday included zero condemnation of Russia for interfering in a US presidential election.

Instead, it focused on bolstering President Donald Trump’s longtime arguments that there was “no collusion” between his campaign and Russia and that the interference didn’t change the outcome of the election.

The White House highlighted three key quotes from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s Friday press conference announcing the indictments, which specifically addressed those two points:

What the White House statement didn’t choose to include, however, were quotes from Rosenstein about the need to “hold the perpetrators accountable” and “protect against future interference.”

Calling out Russia for launching a malicious attack on American democracy wasn’t a priority for the White House, it seems — a glaring omission many on Twitter noticed immediately:

As Vox’s Andrew Prokop reports, Mueller filed an indictment on Friday afternoon against 12 Russian intelligence officers for crimes related to hacking and publicly releasing Democrats’ emails, allegedly as part of an effort to sway the 2016 presidential campaign.

The indictment offers more details around the high-profile hackings of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, massive breaches that took place during the 2016 election. It ties both cyberattacks to intelligence officers from Russia’s military intelligence agency, the GRU.

What the indictment does not do, however, is allege that any Americans or any members of the Trump campaign were criminally involved in the hacking or leaks. As its statement makes very clear, the White House wanted to make sure that was the top takeaway.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters