Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump’s prepared statement had “no colusion” scrawled on the side

Trump apparently needed crib notes reminding him: “THERE WAS NO COLUSION.”

President Donald Trump really wants to emphasize that, according to him, there was “no collusion” with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

After his press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki on Monday, Trump gave a prepared statement to reporters during a meeting with members of Congress to clarify a few things — including saying that he does believe the US intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

It took mere minutes following the remarks for people to quickly notice an addition to his typewritten statement, thanks to an image from CNN reporter Kevin Liptak. It appears someone scrawled “There was no colusion” in capital letters on the side of the script.

The same editor, wielding a thick black marker (one of Trump’s trademarks), also appears to have deleted the sentence fragment “Anyone involved in that meddling to justice” immediately following Trump’s assertion that “I have on numerous occasions noted our intelligence findings that Russians attempted to interfere in our elections.”

The statement to reporters directly contradicted what Trump had said at the Monday press conference, where he suggested that he trusted Putin’s word over that of US intelligence agencies, which have provided damning evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election: “I don’t see any reason why it would be [Russia],” he said.

Trump claimed Tuesday that he intended to say “I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be [Russia]” — and that he thought the meaning was “obvious.”

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation hasn’t uncovered conclusive proof of collusion (that we know of). But Mueller has found plenty of evidence that points in that direction. While it’s unclear who wrote that popular phrase so largely and openly on the side of prepared statements, it’s a refrain that Trump has returned to time and again in his tweets (where it’s usually spelled correctly):

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters