This article originally appeared on Recode.net.
Zuckerberg: The Recode interview

Getty ImagesYesterday, I motored my Ford Fiesta down to Facebook’s headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif., to interview CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg.
I had not done a formal interview with Zuckerberg since he appeared at our D: All Things Digital conference in 2010, when the company was in its early days. Now, Zuckerberg was ensconced in a massive building with a garden on the roof, part of an even larger campus that sprawled all over and was still growing.
Read Article >Mark Zuckerberg clarifies: ‘I personally find Holocaust denial deeply offensive, and I absolutely didn’t intend to defend the intent of people who deny that.’


Mark Zuckerberg clarifies Justin Sullivan / GettyI just got this email from Facebook CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg, clarifying remarks he made in a Recode Decode podcast interview I did with him yesterday.
First, read it in its entirety:
Read Article >Mark Zuckerberg says breaking up Facebook would pave the way for China’s tech companies to dominate

Getty ImagesSome people think Facebook has grown so big that the government should step in and break the company up. Not surprisingly, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is not one of those people.
The Facebook founder has argued before that Facebook isn’t a monopoly because it has a lot of competitors. But now Zuckerberg has another argument: Breaking up Facebook would be bad for America because it would clear the way for Chinese tech companies — which don’t have traditional American values — to step in and dominate.
Read Article >Here’s why Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t think Infowars should be banned

Getty ImagesFacebook wants to rid itself of so-called “fake news,” and Infowars, the far-right site that often promotes appalling conspiracy theories, is one of the most egregious purveyors of fake news, including insisting that the Sandy Hook shooting of school children was staged.
That’s why a lot of people were confused last week when Facebook said it wouldn’t ban a site like Infowars, even though it acknowledged the service often shares “conspiracy theories or false news.”
Read Article >