Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The absurd 24 hours unleashed by one bad White House answer on Russia

How White House press secretary Sarah Sanders unleashed a Putin-related firestorm.

White House press secretary unleashed a firestorm on Wednesday.
White House press secretary unleashed a firestorm on Wednesday.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders unleashed a firestorm on Wednesday.
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Over the past 24 hours, a huge controversy erupted in Washington over whether President Donald Trump would agree to let the Russian government interrogate 11 Americans — including a former US ambassador to Moscow.

It all stems from an offer Russian President Vladimir Putin made to Trump during their meeting in Helsinki on July 16.

Here’s the proposal: Putin offered to “help” with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation (the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, which we know was directed by Putin himself) by having his government interrogate the 12 Russian military intelligence officers charged in the probe last Friday — and letting Mueller watch.

But in exchange for this totally legit offer that in no way would be a complete and utter farce (ahem), Trump would have to allow Russian government officials to come to the US and question a group of Americans — including former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul — about their alleged “illegal activities” (in the words of the Kremlin).

It was a patently ridiculous proposal. Obviously.

Trump called it “an incredible offer.”

On Wednesday afternoon, a reporter asked White House press secretary Sarah Sanders at a press conference if Trump was actually seriously considering accepting Putin’s proposal. Her answer was shocking because she didn’t immediately rule it out.

“The president is going to meet with his team, and we’ll let you know when we have an announcement on that,” Sanders said. She also noted that Trump had not committed to anything one way or the other during his talks with Putin.

That unleashed a firestorm.

The administration received widespread, bipartisan condemnation for not immediately rejecting the idea out of hand. Some former Trump White House officials and diplomats also criticized it. A currently serving diplomat told the Daily Beast that he was “at a fucking loss” over the White House’s comments.

Interestingly, State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert was also asked about this on the same day as the White House briefing — and she did reject the idea right away, calling Putin’s proposal “absolutely absurd.”

But it didn’t matter. The firestorm had started, and there seemed to be no stopping it.

On Thursday afternoon, the Senate announced it would hold a vote on a symbolic, nonbinding resolution basically saying, “Hey, Trump, we really, really don’t think you should let Russia interrogate US officials.”

Shortly after, Sanders put out a statement saying that Trump “disagrees” with Putin’s proposal, but it was too little, too late. The Senate resolution passed in a unanimous 98-0 vote.

The damage was done. It looked like Trump had been planning to “sell out” a former top US diplomat and several other Americans who were critical of Vladimir Putin. And all for a ridiculous offer from Putin to “help” Mueller investigate his own people.

Not the best look given the week Trump’s already had.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters