Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Apple, YouTube and Facebook won’t silence Alex Jones and Infowars — but their bans will sharply limit his reach

In media, distribution is king.

Infowars host Alex Jones
Infowars host Alex Jones
Infowars host Alex Jones
Oli Scarff / Getty

Slowly, and then all at once: That’s how the internet giants decided to end their relationships with Alex Jones, whose Infowars brand has peddled conspiracy theories and other forms of disinformation to large audiences for years.

Since yesterday, Apple Podcasts, Facebook and YouTube — where the Alex Jones channel had more than 2.4 million subscribers — have removed Jones’s presence from their sites, generally citing violations of their terms of service around hate content. Spotify removed some of Jones’s podcasts last week.

All of the platforms had received sharp and deserved criticism for allowing disinformation to flourish. But none seemed willing to draw the line on Infowars — until now.

“Apple does not tolerate hate speech, and we have clear guidelines that creators and developers must follow to ensure we provide a safe environment for all of our users,” the company said yesterday in a statement. “We believe in representing a wide range of views, so long as people are respectful to those with differing opinions.”

In Facebook’s case, the company “removed four pages belonging to Mr. Jones for violating its policies by ‘glorifying violence’ and ‘using dehumanizing language to describe people who are transgender, Muslims and immigrants,’” the New York Times reported.

It has taken some evolution of thought — and probably watching its peers make more decisive moves — for Facebook to get there. Almost a month ago, the company’s official Twitter account tweeted: “We just don’t think banning Pages for sharing conspiracy theories or false news is the right way to go.” Then Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s founder and CEO, tried to support that sentiment in an interview with Recode, but created his own embarrassing controversy by bringing up — and seemingly defending — Holocaust deniers as a similar example, which he later walked back.

For now, the Infowars app is still available in Apple’s U.S. iPhone App Store, where it is the no. 37 ranked news app, just above Bloomberg’s; it’s possible Apple will pull the plug there, too. @RealAlexJones still has his Twitter account, where he has 830,000 followers; @Infowars has another 418,000. Jones’s podcasts can still be downloaded via RSS feed.

And the infowars.com site is still live. If Jones’s providers have a change of heart, he may eventually have to move to a web host or domain-name registrar that doesn’t disapprove of his content. But it will be nearly impossible to silence him on the open web. There are far darker corners.

Still, the bans from YouTube, Facebook and Apple will hurt. In media, distribution is king. And Jones is no longer welcome on many of the world’s largest video and spoken-audio distribution platforms.

Devoted fans will still be able to watch, read, listen and link to Jones, and people will still be able to make videos and podcasts about Jones’s ideas (unless they themselves violate the platforms’ rules).

But it will be considerably harder for Jones and his ideas to make it to casual, mainstream viewers and listeners. Videos will be more cumbersome to find, share and embed, and will no longer appear in YouTube and Facebook’s discovery engines. The bans — as intended — will almost certainly limit his reach.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel