Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Devin Nunes tape tells us what we all knew: his investigation is about protecting Trump

He’s been working tirelessly to shield Trump from the Russia probe for a year and a half.

Devin Nunes
Devin Nunes
Devin Nunes in the Capitol on June 7, 2018.
Alex Wong/Getty
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

For the past 17 months, the investigations led by House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes (R-CA) have looked to anyone with eyes like they’re chiefly about protecting President Trump.

Now a new tape of Nunes speaking at a fundraiser, obtained by The Rachel Maddow Show, makes indisputably clear that that is indeed his aim — even, he says, if special counsel Robert Mueller finds presidential wrongdoing.

“If Sessions won’t unrecuse and Mueller won’t clear the president, we’re the only ones,” Nunes says on the tape, referring to his colleagues in the GOP-controlled House. “Which is really the danger.”

He continues: “That’s why I keep — and thank you for saying it, by the way — I mean, we have to keep all these seats. We have to keep the majority. If we do not keep the majority, all of this goes away.”

The logic is obvious, albeit cynical. Mueller really may find wrongdoing from Trump, Nunes effectively admits, and if he does, the president will need a House GOP majority to boldly look the other way.

In a sense, it’s shocking that the chair of the House Intelligence Committee would reveal that his goal isn’t to get to the bottom of Russian interference in US politics, and find out whether President Trump or his associates were involved in it — but rather, to protect the president in case investigators refuse to “clear” him.

But of course, Nunes has been doing this in public view for nearly a year and a half now. He’s seemed largely indifferent to questions of the Trump campaign and Russian interference. Instead, he’s has focused his work on trying to investigate the investigators themselves — aggressively aiming his subpoena power at the Justice Department, to try to find whatever documents and information he can that he can use to discredit the investigation.

A year and a half of Devin Nunes investigations

This started all the way back in March 2017, when President Trump tweeted out the false accusation that President Obama “had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower.” Of course, he had no evidence for this.

Days later, it was Nunes who took on the task of trying to find that evidence — or, more accurately, to find some tangentially related stuff that Trump and his allies could pretend was evidence for his claim.

What he came up with was the now-forgotten “unmasking” controversy — basically, that certain Obama officials had reviewed surveillance intercepts about foreigners meeting unnamed Trump aides, and tried to learn the names of the specific Trump aides they were meeting. Experts generally said this happens all the time, and no one came up with any evidence that anything illegal had taken place.

But it was good enough for Fox News and the president’s Twitter account, both of which were desperately trying to counter Trump-Russia scandal media coverage by inventing new scandals in which Democrats were the ones at fault.

Nunes has followed this basic playbook again and again ever since. He’d send out subpoenas and demand testimony from Justice Department officials, under the pretext that he’s merely doing oversight work. And of course, congressional oversight of law enforcement agencies is a useful and necessary thing.

Yet overall, Nunes has used his committee powers in a remarkably political and partisan way. Rather than making a fair-minded effort to review investigators’ work, he’s constantly tried to use whatever he can find — often wrenched out of context or misleadingly spun, as in his infamous “Nunes memo” — to attack the Justice Department and try to discredit Mueller’s investigation of Trump.

The true goal appeared to be to search for anything that could be spun as wrongdoing from Obama officials or Justice Department leadership. And pseudo-scandal after pseudo-scandal has been drummed up, fed to conservative media, and echoed from the presidential bully pulpit — from unmasking to “FISA abuse” to “Spygate.” In each case, Nunes and his allies try to spin the act of even looking into the Trump team’s ties to Russia as inherently scandalous and partisan.

Meanwhile, Nunes continues to demand the FBI and Justice Department hand over yet more documents about the Trump-Russia investigation — even though the investigation is still ongoing. DOJ has resisted handing over these documents, and Nunes’s allies have then cited this resistance as grounds for trying to impeach Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

So yes, Nunes has now been secretly taped admitting that his goal is to protect Trump in the case of an adverse finding by Mueller. But he’s been doing it in plain sight all along.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters