Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

House Democrat: here are 8 scandals Congress should investigate instead of Twitter bias

Twitter’s Jack Dorsey is testifying in Congress. Democrats think it’s a waste of his time.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Testifies To House Hearing On Company’s Transparency and Accountability
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Testifies To House Hearing On Company’s Transparency and Accountability
Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s CEO, testified in Congress.
Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Congress is wasting Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s time when it should be investigating the Trump administration’s wrongdoing, Maryland Democrat Rep. John Sarbanes told Dorsey at one of his two congressional testimonies Wednesday.

Dorsey spent Wednesday fielding questions in the House about how Twitter’s efforts to combat dangerous information and misinformation shared on the social media platform is actually censoring conservative voices.

And while Republicans eagerly used the opportunity to question how Twitter guards against its employees’ personal biases when deciding what to block and remove from the site, the hearing wasn’t as enthusiastically received by Democratic lawmakers.

“Unfortunately, the Republican majority has decided to pursue the trumped up notion that there is a special conservative bias in the way Twitter operates,” Sarbanes told Dorsey. “What worries me is that this is a campaign by the GOP to work the refs, complaining about a non-existent bias and force an overcorrection which then can result in some actual bias going in the other direction.”

So in response, Sarbanes disregarded the premise of the hearing altogether, and instead read off a list of things the Republican-led Congress should be investigating and isn’t. Conveniently for Sarbanes, his speech also fit perfectly into Democrats’ 2018 message to voters: that the Republican party is corrupt.

Here’s Sarbanes’s list of what Congress should be further investigating:

  • President Donald Trump’s tax returns
  • Trump’s business dealings with Russia
  • Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin’s business dealings
  • An inquiry into alleged email misuse by White House staff
  • How taxpayer money has been used by cabinet secretaries like former EPA Director Scott Pruitt (Pruitt is still under investigation, but Democrats are calling on the FBI to also get involved)
  • An investigation into Trump’s motives for the travel ban and zero-tolerance policy at the border, which led to more than 2,000 children being separated from their families
  • The White House’s response to Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico, where the death toll far exceeded government numbers
  • The White House’s election security efforts

“We are 60 days away from the midterm elections,” Sarbanes said. “We know there are efforts to disrupt our democracy. We know these same actors — these foreign and hostile actors — this very platform, Twitter, to sow discord … instead, here we are using our precious resources to feed deep state conspiracy theories proffered by our president and his allies in Congress.”

Sarbanes’s comments at the hearing are part of congressional Democrats’ major message to voters in 2018; they’re calling bullshit on Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp.” The pitch includes proposals to protect and improve voting rights, new ethics laws, and campaign finance reforms, including policies that would make lobbyists’ activities more transparent and tighten rules around bribery and fraud convictions.

The platform itself is reminiscent of a message Democrats campaigned on in 2006, a midterm election year that also came after historic Republican corruption scandals and resulted in Democratic control in the House, Senate, and a majority of governorships.

It’s not clear, though, what Dorsey made of it, since Sarbanes didn’t ask Dorsey a question or give him time to respond.

More in Congress

Today, Explained newsletter
Eric Swalwell’s downfall, explainedEric Swalwell’s downfall, explained
Today, Explained newsletter

The accusations that forced out the frontrunner in California’s governor race — and could push him from Congress next.

By Benjy Sarlin
Podcasts
How one Democratic senator is tackling Trump’s corruptionHow one Democratic senator is tackling Trump’s corruption
Podcast
Podcasts

Sen. Chris Murphy explains how blatant corruption is undermining faith in democracy.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Nancy Pelosi tells us how she really feelsNancy Pelosi tells us how she really feels
Podcast
Podcasts

The former House speaker on the midterms, Trump, and democracy.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Bernie Sanders explains his proposed billionaire taxBernie Sanders explains his proposed billionaire tax
Play
Podcasts

It would give $3,000 to every American in a household earning less than $150,000.

By Jesse Ash and Astead Herndon
Podcasts
The “Epstein class,” explainedThe “Epstein class,” explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Why Rep. Ro Khanna isn’t done talking about the Epstein files.

By Astead Herndon and Cameron Peters
America After Trump
US democracy has repaired itself before. Here’s how we can do it again.US democracy has repaired itself before. Here’s how we can do it again.
America After Trump

America has remade itself every few decades. Are we due?

By Lee Drutman