Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Lindsey Graham asks about debunked right-wing conspiracies in William Barr hearing

And President Trump’s attorney general nominee seems worried about some of them.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC), awaits the start of the confirmation hearing of attorney general nominee William Barr on January 15, 2019 in Washington, DC.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC), awaits the start of the confirmation hearing of attorney general nominee William Barr on January 15, 2019 in Washington, DC.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) awaits the start of the confirmation hearing of attorney general nominee William Barr on January 15, 2019, in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the new Judiciary Committee chair, opened up the confirmation hearing for President Trump’s new attorney general pick with a series of questions about right-wing conspiracy theories related to the Russia investigation.

That doesn’t exactly bode well for the rest of the hearing — and perhaps his whole tenure at the committee’s helm.

Graham asked William Barr, Trump’s nominee for the country’s top legal post, about whether he would investigate the people investigating Trump. Barr will take over supervision of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation if confirmed.

Graham asked Barr about Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, two former federal investigators, who texted each other messages bashing Trump and saying that they would “stop” his 2016 election victory.

There is still no proof that they inappropriately used their positions at the FBI to work against Trump — in fact, reviews of the texts show no conspiracy between them against the president. But when Graham asked, “How do these statements sit with you?” Barr said he was “shocked” when he saw the texts in public reports.

Join the Vox Video Lab

Go behind the scenes. Chat with creators. Support Vox video. Become a member of the Vox Video Lab on YouTube today. (Heads up: You might be asked to sign in to Google first.)

Graham then turned to Bruce Ohr.

Ohr works in the criminal division of the Justice Department, but within some conservative circles, he is considered a dirty official who knew about former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele and the salacious dossier Steele helped create. Ohr met and emailed multiple times with Steele, and they were in contact from 2002 to 2017. Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, also worked at Fusion GPS, the company Steele worked for when writing the dossier.

But while the optics look bad, there’s no clear indication that Ohr somehow orchestrated the Steele report to embarrass and ruin Trump’s chances of a presidential victory. When Graham asked Barr if the Ohr’s connections to Fusion GPS and Steele bothered him, though, Barr responded, “Yes.”

Trump has tweeted his displeasure about Ohr on multiple occasions, mostly wondering aloud why Ohr still works for the government.

Graham then asked Barr what he thought about the special counsel. Barr, who said he’s known Mueller for three decades, said he didn’t believe Mueller would engage in a “witch hunt” against the president after Graham prompted him.

Put together, it’s clear that Graham used one of the most important moments of the hearing — the chair’s initial questions — to hear the attorney general’s views on right-wing talking points. What’s more, when it comes to Strzok, Page, and the Ohrs, it seems Barr shares some of Graham’s worries.

The moment illustrates that Graham’s tenure at the Justice panel’s helm may be a tumultuous one — and that Barr’s time at the Justice Department, if confirmed, may be just as turbulent.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters