Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

FBI director: White nationalist violence is a “persistent, pervasive threat”

His views match those of experts within the Department of Justice — just not the White House.

FBI Director Christopher Wray.
FBI Director Christopher Wray.
FBI Director Christopher Wray testifies during a US House Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee hearing on the FBI’s Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2020, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, April 4, 2019.
AFP/Getty Images

President Trump has largely shrugged off concerns about white nationalism in the United States — telling reporters on March 15 after a white nationalist murdered 50 people in Christchurch, New Zealand, that “I think it’s a small group of people that have very, very serious problems, I guess.”

His FBI director takes the threat much more seriously.

During a House Appropriations Committee hearing with FBI Director Christopher Wray on Thursday, Wray said the danger of white nationalist and white nationalist extremists in America is “significant,” adding that, like other extremist groups, they are a “persistent, pervasive threat.”

That answer, in response to a question from Rep. Jose Serrano, matches the assessment of experts both within the Department of Justice and elsewhere. So does Director Wray’s argument that domestic terrorism is largely “less structured, less organized,” with “more uncoordinated, one-off individuals as opposed to some structured hierarchy,” which Wray said “presents its own share of challenges.”

As has been the case over and over again, from Oklahoma City to Oslo to Christchurch, “small groups of people” committed to the white nationalist cause can and have enacted horrific violence. Since 2007, the FBI reports that white nationalist and far-right violent attacks increased from roughly five incidents per year to 31 in 2017.

And concerns about white nationalist violence, specifically white nationalist “lone wolf”-style perpetrators like in Christchurch or the 2015 Charleston church massacre, have indeed been weighing on federal officials. As reported by the Center for Strategic and International Studies in a November 2018 report on far-right extremism:

Today, some in the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and state and local law enforcement agencies have expressed alarm at far-right extremism. The Trump Administration’s counterterrorism strategy, released in October 2018, warned that the United States faces a threat from individuals motivated by types of violent extremism other than radical Islam, “such as racially motivated extremism, animal rights extremism, environmental extremism, sovereign citizen extremism, and militia extremism.” In April 2018, federal authorities charged 57 members of white supremacist organizations with drug trafficking and kidnapping. As U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions remarked following the arrest, “Not only do white supremacist gangs subscribe to a repugnant, hateful ideology, they also engage in significant, organized and violent criminal activity.” He continued that “the Department of Justice has targeted every violent criminal gang member in the United States. The quantities of drugs, guns, and money seized in this case are staggering.”

However, despite federal concerns about white nationalist extremism, the federal funding to counter that extremism either hasn’t appeared or in some cases has even been rescinded by the Trump administration.

Now many experts — and members of Congress — are decrying the lack of funding for efforts to counter white nationalist extremism. In a letter to the House Appropriations Committee sent April 1, Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-NJ) asked for increased funding to combat white nationalist groups, writing, “It is time to take the transnational threat of white supremacist terrorism as seriously as we’ve rightly taken the threat posed by other international terrorist organizations, and to give our law enforcement and intelligence agencies the mandate and resources they need to keep us safe.”

Civil rights groups and religious organizations have also been pressing the FBI and the Department of Justice to do more to counter white nationalist extremism.

Policy
The fight over transgender rights in America has entered a new phaseThe fight over transgender rights in America has entered a new phase
Policy

The policy fight is moving well beyond sports and youth medicine. The political response hasn’t caught up.

By Rachel Cohen Booth
Policy
What happens when a city takes women’s unpaid work seriously?What happens when a city takes women’s unpaid work seriously?
Policy

Bogotá’s radical experiment in caregiving is going global.

By Rachel Cohen Booth
Future Perfect
How to save Social Security without screwing over poor peopleHow to save Social Security without screwing over poor people
Future Perfect

Raising the retirement age does more to hurt poorer people who live less long.

By Dylan Matthews
Social Programs
Trump is hoping to quietly gut the social safety netTrump is hoping to quietly gut the social safety net
Social Programs

The president is keeping his hands off Social Security and Medicare — at least for now.

By Abdallah Fayyad
Policy
The Trump-approved policy that’s actually good for kidsThe Trump-approved policy that’s actually good for kids
Policy

Pro-natalists want America having more babies — but only one of their proposals helps actual children.

By Anna North
Politics
The Social Security crisis, briefly explainedThe Social Security crisis, briefly explained
Politics

The Trump administration is putting millions of people’s retirement benefits at risk.

By Abdallah Fayyad