Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

2020 Democrats’ response to Mueller statement: Impeach

Their colleagues in the House aren’t so sure.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller leaves after speaking on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election, at the US Justice Department in Washington, DC, on May 29, 2019.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller leaves after speaking on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election, at the US Justice Department in Washington, DC, on May 29, 2019.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller leaves after speaking on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election, at the US Justice Department in Washington, DC, on May 29, 2019.
Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

“The ball is in our court, Congress,” Rep. Justin Amash — the lone House Republican advocating impeachmenttweeted Wednesday, following special counsel Robert Mueller’s public statement.

One huge takeaway from Mueller’s report and statement today is the special counsel felt the law and Justice Department policy prevented him from charging President Donald Trump with obstruction, even though there was evidence of it. But Mueller also reiterated that Congress is not so hamstrung.

“The opinion [in the report] says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” he said.

Mueller was clear in his report: Congress is the body that gets to decide whether Trump obstructed justice.

“The conclusion that Congress may apply obstruction laws to the President’s corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law,” Mueller wrote in his report.

But Congress may be no closer to pulling the trigger on impeachment proceedings than they were last week. Democrats are still divided on where to go from here.

Democrats running for president are ready to start impeachment proceedings. House Democrats aren’t as sure.

On Wednesday, a number of Democrats running for president reiterated calls for impeachment. Meanwhile, House Democrats, who are the most consequential figures to decide whether Congress will pursue impeachment, kept their thoughts much closer to the vest.

Here are the statements of some presidential candidates on impeachment after Mueller’s Wednesday statement.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand and Cory Booker were all in on Congress starting impeachment proceedings immediately.

Rep. Seth Moulton came out with a full-throated call to start impeachment hearings “tomorrow,” while a House colleague also running for president, Rep. Eric Swalwell, said on MSNBC that he believed Mueller would testify in front of the House Judiciary Committee — even though Mueller cast doubt on whether he would testify.

Former Vice President Joe Biden, who is leading in the polls, took a more measured tone than many of his colleagues in a campaign statement. Biden agreed with the strategy of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: continuing to investigate the president. His campaign said that while impeachment proceedings would be “divisive,” it may also become “unavoidable” in the future.

“Congress must do everything in its power to hold this Administration to account,” the campaign statement read. “That is what Congress is doing and should do: continue to investigate.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, another leading candidate in the presidential race, walked a middle ground. While not calling for immediate impeachment, Sanders said he’d support the House Judiciary Committee if they decided to launch an impeachment inquiry.

To be sure, it’s easier for presidential candidates to call for impeachment. House Democrats are in more of a bind because they are the ones ultimately in charge of deciding whether to start proceedings.

There’s disagreement within the Democratic caucus over how far to go on impeachment. House Democrats’ statements following Mueller’s Wednesday remarks ranged from saying Democrats need to dig into their investigations to calling for impeachment outright, as House Financial Services Committee Chair Maxine Waters (D-CA) did in a tweet.

“No more hiding behind the special counsel,” Waters tweeted. “Enough is enough. It’s time to #ImpeachTrump.”

But House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who is in charge of the committee that could open an impeachment inquiry, made no mention of impeachment in his statement.

“Given that Special Counsel Mueller was unable to pursue criminal charges against the president, it falls to Congress to respond to the crimes, lies, and other wrongdoing of President Trump — and we will do so,” Nadler said.

But, importantly, Nadler did not say what exactly Congress should do to hold the president to account.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi continued her call for Congress to do its investigative work deliberatively.

“The Congress holds sacred its constitutional responsibility to investigate and hold the President accountable for his abuse of power,” she said in a statement. “The Congress will continue to investigate and legislate to protect our elections and secure our democracy. The American people must have the truth.”

Pelosi has said House Democrats should only pursue impeachment if they find something explosive enough that there is bipartisan agreement to do so. Her statement today seems to indicate Democrats haven’t yet found it.

The question now is if Mueller said anything to change her or her committee chairs’ minds.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters