Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Trump administration has started sending Brazilian asylum seekers back to Mexico

It’s an expansion of the “Remain in Mexico” program.

Migrants from Brazil cross the Rio Grande in Ciudad Juárez in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on June 12, 2019, before turning themselves into US Border Patrol agents to claim asylum. 
Migrants from Brazil cross the Rio Grande in Ciudad Juárez in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on June 12, 2019, before turning themselves into US Border Patrol agents to claim asylum. 
Migrants from Brazil cross the Rio Grande in Ciudad Juárez in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on June 12, 2019, before turning themselves into US Border Patrol agents to claim asylum.
Herika Martinez/AFP via Getty Images
Nicole Narea
Nicole Narea covered politics at Vox. She first joined Vox in 2019, and her work has also appeared in Politico, Washington Monthly, and the New Republic.

The Trump administration announced Wednesday that it is sending Brazilian migrants arriving at the southern border back to Mexico to wait for decisions on their asylum applications in the US.

It’s part of the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to expand the “Remain in Mexico” program, officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), under which the administration has already sent some 60,000 asylum seekers to Mexico to wait for their court dates in the US, often for months at a time.

Trump administration officials have touted the program as one of the primary drivers of the approximately 75 percent decline in apprehensions at the southern border since last May. But the Trump administration acknowledges that there remains a humanitarian crisis along the border — one that immigrant advocates say has only been exacerbated by MPP.

Until recently, most immigrant advocates thought that only Spanish-speaking migrants would be subject to MPP. But the Department of Homeland Security clarified in a statement Wednesday that there is no such limit on the program. Indeed, citizens of Trinidad and Tobago and Albania have also been sent back to Mexico under MPP in addition to Brazilians, according to Mexico’s National Institute of Migration.

The rationale behind sending only Spanish speaking-populations to Mexico for prolonged periods is that they would be better able to assimilate into local society and find work. Brazilians who only speak Portuguese, by contrast, will face additional economic hardship, threats to their personal safety, and difficulty securing legal representation.

It’s not clear at this point how many Brazilians have been sent back to Mexico under MPP. Some have been returned to Ciudad Juárez, which is right across the border from El Paso, Texas. Like other migrants who have been sent back to Mexico under MPP, they face the dangers of extortion, rape, and kidnapping at the hands of drug cartels and other criminal actors.

“Their vulnerability to kidnapping is greater [because] of their lack of Spanish skills,” Taylor Levy, one of the few immigration attorneys representing migrants affected by MPP, tweeted Wednesday.

Levy said she did not know of any attorneys in the Ciudad Juárez area who speak Portuguese. It’s unclear whether either the US or Mexican government will provide translators to Brazilian migrants.

The number of Brazilians arrested by US Customs and Border Protection spiked last year to around 18,000, up from just 1,600 the year before. The catalyst may have been the 2018 election of Brazil’s far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, whose tenure has been characterized by high unemployment, a series of corruption scandals, and increased crime.

DHS touted the decision to expand MPP to Brazilians on Wednesday as a means of discouraging unauthorized immigration.

“The fact that Brazilians are now part of the program shows that the Department, along with its Mexican counterparts, have always sought to expand the program in a safe and responsible manner,” DHS said in a statement.

Before MPP, both those who waited in line at the border and those who were apprehended between ports of entry would have been held at a US Customs and Border Protection processing facility until a border agent determined whether they should be released, transferred to immigration detention, or deported. But now, they are mostly sent back to Mexico and have only been allowed to enter the US to attend their immigration court hearings.

They have been waiting in Mexican border cities where some migrants are lucky to find housing in shelters, hotels, or rooms for rent. But for more than 5,000 others, only colorful tents and tarps, some held up by only sticks and stones, stand between them and the elements, even as temperatures drop below freezing. The encampments are clustered around bridges linked to US ports of entry along the Rio Grande, where they rely on volunteers for basic necessities like clean drinking water and warm clothes.

More in Immigration

Politics
Even this Supreme Court seems unwilling to end birthright citizenshipEven this Supreme Court seems unwilling to end birthright citizenship
Politics

At least seven justices appear to believe that the Fourteenth Amendment means what it says.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
How ICE has changed American lifeHow ICE has changed American life
Politics

Immigrant or not, Trump’s mass deportation pledges have fundamentally changed how regular people live.

By Christian Paz
Politics
The sneaky way Trump’s lawyers are supercharging ICEThe sneaky way Trump’s lawyers are supercharging ICE
Politics

A court just gave awful news to victims of ICE’s occupation of Minneapolis.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The ugly history behind Trump’s birthright citizenship case in the Supreme CourtThe ugly history behind Trump’s birthright citizenship case in the Supreme Court
Politics

The peculiar legal argument behind Trump’s attack on citizenship was invented by 19th-century anti-Chinese racists.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The people dying in ICE custodyThe people dying in ICE custody
The Logoff

ICE detentions are up. So are deaths.

By Cameron Peters
Policy
The ICE pandemicThe ICE pandemic
Policy

It feels like 2020 all over again.

By Anna North