Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

2 key GOP swing votes will vote against witnesses in the impeachment trial

Sens. Lamar Alexander and Lisa Murkowski have effectively decided the outcome of a vote on witnesses.

Sen. Lamar Alexander...
Sen. Lamar Alexander...
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., arrives in the Capitol for a vote on Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2019.
Photo By Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) have made up their minds.

Both moderates, who have long been closely watched swing votes in the Senate impeachment trial, will not be voting in favor of calling witnesses. Their announcements effectively decide the outcome of a witness vote expected late Friday, and deal a major blow to Democrats who have pushed for additional testimony from individuals with direct knowledge about the White House’s handling of aid to Ukraine. They also signal that the Senate will swiftly move toward acquittal, after checking off some procedural boxes.

The two Senate Republicans offered slightly different reasons for their final decision.

Alexander concluded that the Democrats did prove their case against Trump, and were able to demonstrate that he conditioned military aid on the announcement of political investigations. Even so, he said, these actions do not meet the threshold of an impeachable offense.

“There is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the US Constitution’s high bar for an impeachable offense,” he wrote.

Murkowski, meanwhile, did not indicate whether she believed that the Democrats had made their case — but called out Congress writ large for failing as an institution.

In her statement, Murkowski slammed the House’s “flawed” and “rushed” articles of impeachment, while signaling that she wasn’t interested in drawing Chief Justice John Roberts into a fight over a potential tie vote. Although Roberts wasn’t expected to break a tie over witnesses, the scenario would have shifted the focus onto his role in the trial.

Murkowski, too, noted that she did not see the addition of witness testimony changing the outcome of the trial. “I don’t believe the continuation of this process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed,” she said.

Murkowski and Alexander, along with Sens. Mitt Romney (R-UT) and Susan Collins (R-ME) were among a handful of lawmakers considered potential swing votes on the witness question. As of Friday afternoon, Romney and Collins were the only Republicans to indicate that they were in favor of calling witnesses.

Without Murkowski and Alexander, Democrats don’t have the pivotal four votes they need to reach a 51-vote simple majority that’s required to approve motions for witnesses. As a result, Trump’s impeachment trial is poised to be the first one in US history that does not include witness testimony.

What comes next

The official vote on whether to allow witnesses is still slated to take place on Friday afternoon, after additional arguments from the House impeachment managers and Trump’s legal defense team.

With the Senate on track to reject the consideration of more witnesses, the trial is set to move quickly toward an acquittal vote later this weekend, or even next week. Democrats intend to force a number of votes to delay the process, but the proceedings aren’t expected to stretch beyond the coming week.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters