Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A DHS agency said America’s elections were secure. So Trump fired its leader.

Chris Krebs, a cybersecurity leader, was dismissed for doing his job.

Christopher Krebs, then-director of the Homeland Security Department’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in May 2019.
Christopher Krebs, then-director of the Homeland Security Department’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in May 2019.
Christopher Krebs, then-director of the Homeland Security Department’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in May 2019.
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call
Jen Kirby
Jen Kirby is a senior foreign and national security reporter at Vox, where she covers global instability.

President Donald Trump fired Chris Krebs, who led the Homeland Security Department’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), on Tuesday evening — days after the agency, which is in charge of protecting elections, called the 2020 presidential election “the most secure in American history.”

Trump did so because the agency’s — and Krebs’s personal — defense of the integrity of the elections punctures Trump’s baseless claim that the election was stolen from him.

CISA’s statement rebutted many of the conspiracy theories Trump has used to claim there was some sort of wrongdoing, and said, in part, “While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too.”

On Tuesday evening, Trump dismissed Krebs in a tweet, falsely calling the statement “highly inaccurate” and claiming that because of that, “effective immediately,” Krebs “has been terminated” as CISA director.

This news isn’t all that surprising; Krebs had reportedly told people for some time that he expected to be fired after the election, in large part because his efforts to correct false claims about election vulnerabilities and mail-in voting had long put him on the wrong side of the White House.

Krebs, who ran the agency that Trump himself signed into existence in 2018, had garnered substantial bipartisan support for his efforts to shore up and strengthen America’s election infrastructure and defend against foreign interference.

In 2020, CISA set up a 24/7 “war room” that election officials could contact to report suspicious activity in real time, and had CISA officials at the ready to deploy to polling places, if necessary, according to the Washington Post. CISA streamlined coordination between states and the federal government on election security concerns, and beefed up its public communication before and after the election on potential threats, including setting up a “rumor control” webpage to debunk election disinformation.

Of course, countering election falsehoods is infinitely more difficult when the president and his allies are the main purveyors of that disinformation. That presidential disinformation campaign — in particular, the lie that a voting system used by certain states changed Trump votes to ones for President-elect Joe Biden — culminated in a statement from CISA and election officials across the US who said in a bolded statement last week: “There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”

Likely further drawing the president’s ire was that Krebs also tried to counter misinformation on social media from his official account. In a tweet on Tuesday, Krebs said, in response to allegations that voting machines and software were manipulated, that dozens of election experts had said that “‘in every case of which we are aware, these claims either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.’”

After his dismissal, Krebs posted on his personal account: “Honored to serve. We did it right. Defend Today, Secure Tomorrow.”

Democratic lawmakers were quick to condemn Krebs’s dismissal

Krebs’s dismissal drew condemnation from lawmakers, mostly Democrats on Capitol Hill. “Chris Krebs is an extraordinary public servant and exactly the person Americans want protecting the security of our elections,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), vice chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement. “It speaks volumes that the president chose to fire him simply for telling the truth.”

“Whenever folks in CT worried about the integrity of the 2020 election, I would tell them that somehow, someway, Trump had left in place, maybe by accident, actual non-partisan professionals in charge of election security. I was talking about Chris Krebs,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) tweeted.

Republicans, who have been slow at best to refute Trump’s claims, and are often actively trying to help him, were a little more muted in their response. One of the few to offer Krebs support was Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE), who said in a statement that “Chris Krebs did a really good job — as state election officials all across the nation will tell you — and he obviously should not be fired.”

Election officials in 2020 faced extraordinary challenges: the potential repeat of foreign meddling, and a pandemic that forced state and local election officials to implement public health precautions and expand options like mail and early voting. But despite these challenges, the vote was, as one top official for the Election Assistance Commission put it, “one of the smoothest and most well-run elections that we have ever seen.”

But Trump’s refusal to accept the outcome of the 2020 election diminishes these successes while undermining the integrity of November’s elections — and democracy as a whole, which will be even harder to repair after Trump leaves office.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters