Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The fight over stock buybacks and corporate coronavirus bailouts, briefly explained

Trump says he supports limits on stock buybacks for companies getting federal coronavirus help, which Democrats have advocated.

NYSE Closes Trading Floor, Moves To Fully Electronic Trading Amid Coronavirus Pandemic
NYSE Closes Trading Floor, Moves To Fully Electronic Trading Amid Coronavirus Pandemic
Traders, some in medical masks, work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on March 20, 2020 in New York City.
Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Ian Millhiser
Ian Millhiser is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.

Less than a week ago, the US airline industry requested $50 billion in grants and loans from the federal government to help it weather the collapse in travel caused by the coronavirus pandemic, and to help it provide some financial security for the industry’s 750,000 workers.

While there is bipartisan support for the idea that airlines — or, at least, airline workers — should receive some kind of bailout from the federal government, both Democratic lawmakers and unions representing airline workers have warned that this bailout must come with strings attached.

Any airline industry bailout, according to Association of Flight Attendants President Sara Nelson, “should come with significant conditions to help workers and keep planes flying, not enrich shareholders or pad executive bonuses.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), meanwhile, proposed eight ambitious restrictions to be placed on any company receiving a bailout, including a permanent ban on companies engaging in stock buybacks — that is, a rule so that a company may not spend its excess profits to buy stock from its existing investors.

Buybacks can provide a windfall to corporate executives and other investors because they tend to inflate the price of a stock by reducing the number of shares of that stock in circulation. However, they offer little benefit to workers or consumers.

While it still appears unlikely that a permanent ban on buybacks will be included in any corporate bailouts, two recent developments suggest that temporary buyback restrictions will be imposed on companies that receive federal bailouts.

On Saturday, the CEOs of 10 US airlines and the head of Airlines for America, the industry’s trade group, signed a letter to congressional leaders. In it, they agreed to “eliminating stock buy backs over the life of the loans” and “eliminating stock dividends for the life of the loans” if the industry receives at least $29 billion in loans or loan guarantees. The industry leaders also agreed to “limits on executive compensation.”

President Donald Trump also announced his support for restrictions on buybacks in a press conference Saturday afternoon. “I want money to be used for workers and keeping businesses open, not buybacks,” the president said, adding that he is “strongly recommending a buyback exclusion.”

Though negotiations about Congress’s “phase 3” response to the economic fallout from coronavirus remain ongoing, these developments suggest some limits on stock buybacks are very likely to be included in the package.

Limiting such buybacks is a longtime cause of many congressional Democrats and their allies. More than a year ago, Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) published an op-ed in the New York Times arguing that “when more than 90 percent of corporate profits go to buybacks and dividends, there is reason to be concerned.”

The two senators proposed legislation that would “prohibit a corporation from buying back its own stock unless it invests in workers and communities first, including things like paying all workers at least $15 an hour, providing seven days of paid sick leave, and offering decent pensions and more reliable health benefits.”

While such an ambitious proposal is unlikely to be included in the coronavirus bailout legislation, it does appear likely that there will be some protections to ensure taxpayers don’t wind up paying to inflate stock prices.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters