Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How Obamacare helped millions who lost their jobs during Covid-19, in 3 charts

The Affordable Care Act faced its first big test as a safety net during Covid-19. New research finds it’s working well.

Dylan Scott
Dylan Scott covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017.

The Covid-19 pandemic has been the first serious test for the Affordable Care Act as a new social safety net — and the law’s provisions have proven adept, if imperfect, in protecting Americans from losing health insurance in the middle of an infectious disease outbreak and an economic crisis.

Two new analyses published in the last week explain concisely (as will I, aided by their charts) the depth of coverage losses resulting from the job losses of the last six months and the ACA’s success in catching many of those people to give them a new health insurance plan.

This piece by Harvard researchers Sumit Agarwal and Benjamin Sommers, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, lays out how the ACA has made it easier for people who lose their job and their employer-sponsored health insurance to find coverage. The law created private insurance markets, with federal subsidies to help people afford a plan, and encouraged states to expand Medicaid for people in or near poverty. Those provisions, especially Medicaid expansion, led to a meaningful reduction in the number of people who end up becoming uninsured after losing their job.

NEJM

The Harvard researchers summarized their key finding like this:

In the post-ACA period ... job loss was no longer linked to an increase in the uninsured rate. Large gains in Medicaid (8.9 percentage points) and marketplace coverage (2.6 percentage points) nearly fully offset the reduction in ESI for people who left or lost their jobs. Overall, there was a 6.0 percentage point net reduction in loss of coverage after a job loss in the post-ACA period as compared with the pre-ACA period.

This data notably does not cover the coronavirus crisis itself, but it demonstrates Obamacare’s general capacity to function as a safeguard against coverage losses resulting from unemployment.

As Agarwal and Sommers wrote: “These results indicate the critical role that the ACA will play in alleviating coverage losses related to the Covid-associated recession.”

Still, no coverage losses during the Obama administration, when unemployment was on a consistent downward trajectory, can compare to what the US is enduring in the Covid-19 pandemic, when the jobless rate reached nearly 15 percent over the summer, though it has since recovered some.

New estimates from the Economic Policy Institute put the number of people who have lost the health insurance they or a family member previously got through their employer at about 12 million. There has been a significant churn in coverage since the spring.

EPI

Most — but not all — of the people who have lost coverage from their work have gotten coverage from another source, EPI authors Josh Bivens and Ben Zipperer wrote:

A new government survey measuring the economic consequences of the COVID-19 shock in real time indicates that for every 100 workers who were covered by ESI before losing their job, about 85 retained access to some form of health insurance in the week after they lost their job.

Medicaid in particular has picked up much of the slack, with its rolls swelling by 4 million during the downturn. The EPI analysis references previous research that shows that the percentage of unemployed workers covered by Medicaid in the states that have accepted the ACA’s Medicaid expansion is much higher than in nonexpansion states, 36 percent versus 16 percent.

EPI

“These data indicate strongly that it is Medicaid, not the ACA marketplace exchanges, that does the heavy lifting of providing a health insurance safety net for those workers who lose ESI,” Bivens and Zipperer wrote.

Medicaid expansion has often been underappreciated for its role in Obamacare’s success, accounting for more than half of the coverage gains since the law took effect. In the time of Covid-19, it has continued to prove its worth.

But as I covered last week ahead of Joe Biden’s DNC speech, until the dozen Republican-led holdout states come around on Medicaid expansion, or until Democrats pass a plan to extend coverage to the people left in the Medicaid expansion gap, the work of Obamacare will remain unfinished.

This story appears in VoxCare, a newsletter from Vox on the latest twists and turns in America’s health care debate. Sign up to get VoxCare in your inbox along with more health care stats and news.


New goal: 25,000

In the spring, we launched a program asking readers for financial contributions to help keep Vox free for everyone, and last week, we set a goal of reaching 20,000 contributors. Well, you helped us blow past that. Today, we are extending that goal to 25,000. Millions turn to Vox each month to understand an increasingly chaotic world — from what is happening with the USPS to the coronavirus crisis to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work — and helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world. Contribute today from as little as $3.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters