Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Has Trump gained ground? The latest 2024 polling, explained.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: The polls are very close.

Vice President Kamala Harris Campaigns In Bucks County
Vice President Kamala Harris Campaigns In Bucks County
Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at a campaign rally on October 16, 2024, in Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania.
Nathan Morris/NurPhoto via Getty
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

The vibes about who will win the 2024 presidential election may have shifted — but with barely more than two weeks until Election Day, the polls are as inconclusive as they’ve ever been.

Polling averages show a contest in which Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are almost tied in most key swing states. And while Trump’s polling has improved slightly in the past few weeks, it hasn’t been enough to give him a clear edge. At least not yet.

On average, Trump holds a small edge, generally between 1 and 2 points, in Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina. To win the presidency, though, he will need to breach the “blue wall” by winning one of Michigan, Pennsylvania, or Wisconsin. As of midday Monday, those states are still, on average, about tied.

There hasn’t been a ton of high-quality swing-state polling in recent weeks, and the best-regarded pollsters will likely all release new numbers closer to the end of the campaign. Once they do, we could get a better sense of where the race stands.

Related

If polling averages continue to show an extremely close race after a final infusion of high-quality polls, it will only heighten the uncertainty about what will happen. Polling errors — where one candidate or party is systematically underestimated — of the magnitude of a few points are common.

The polls could be underestimating Trump again, as they did in swing states in 2016 and 2020. Alternatively, perhaps pollsters have corrected for their previous bias — or even overcorrected, risking an error that underestimates Harris. We simply won’t know until the votes are counted.

What the polls show in the swing states

To recap: There are seven swing states that will very likely determine the outcome of the election (with every other state expected to go solidly for either Trump or Harris). Listed in order of electoral votes, they are:

  • Pennsylvania (19 electoral votes)
  • North Carolina and Georgia (16 electoral votes each)
  • Michigan (15 electoral votes)
  • Arizona (11 electoral votes)
  • Wisconsin (10 electoral votes)
  • Nevada (6 electoral votes)

If Harris can pick up 44 electoral votes in these swing states, she’ll win the presidency. Trump would need 51 electoral votes from these same states to win. The polls say these swing states are — brace yourself — very close!

Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, and North Carolina all are almost exactly tied in the New York Times’s polling averages, which show Trump up in Georgia by 1 and Arizona by 2. Nate Silver’s polling averages have similar results.

There’s a slightly more rosy story for Harris in the Washington Post’s averages, which show her up by 2 in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. On the other hand, the RealClearPolitics averages show Trump leading by 2 points or less in all the swing states.

But these differences are hair-splitting. None of these results are lopsided enough to instill any real confidence about which way the outcome will go.

Related

Vibes aren’t worth much either

The vibes, on the other hand, point more clearly in one direction: Among Democrats, there’s been increasing trepidation about Harris’s chances, while Republicans sound quite confident in Trump’s.

But the pre-election vibes would have told you that the GOP was headed for a landslide victory in 2022, that Biden was going to win overwhelmingly (rather than very narrowly) in 2020, and that Trump had no chance of winning in 2016. These sorts of intangible hunches and guesses just aren’t worth much.

Some point to purported clues about the outcome in non-polling metrics, like early voting numbers or prediction markets. But early voting numbers are a notoriously bad indicator of what will happen on Election Day. Prediction markets generally reflect conventional wisdom — and this year in particular, they may be skewed by a few big-betting Trump fans.

Once we know the result, hindsight will be 20/20. We can all look back for the clues that were purportedly hidden in plain sight, as we tell ourselves stories about how the outcome was fated all along. For now, though, the race is simply too close to call.

Related

Today, Explained newsletter
5 questions about the Democrats’ Tea Party moment5 questions about the Democrats’ Tea Party moment
Today, Explained newsletter

What’s happening in the Democratic Party? A Vox reporter explains.

By Christian Paz and Cameron Peters
Politics
The Democratic Party is ripe for a takeoverThe Democratic Party is ripe for a takeover
Politics

Is this the start of the Democrats’ Tea Party?

By Christian Paz
Culture
Jeffrey Epstein’s friendship with Donald Trump, explainedJeffrey Epstein’s friendship with Donald Trump, explained
Culture

Was Jeffrey Epstein really Donald Trump’s “closest friend”?

By Aja Romano and Anna North
Defense & Security
Why the Pentagon just can’t quit Elon MuskWhy the Pentagon just can’t quit Elon Musk
Defense & Security

How Musk’s SpaceX became too big to fail for US national security.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Should Democrats fight corporations or red tape? Bad question.Should Democrats fight corporations or red tape? Bad question.
Politics

Democrats should debate messaging less (and policy more).

By Eric Levitz
Politics
3 takeaways from the most authoritative autopsy of the 2024 election yet3 takeaways from the most authoritative autopsy of the 2024 election yet
Politics

New data that debunks the left’s favorite explanation for Harris’s defeat.

By Eric Levitz