Skip to main content
The homepageVoxVox logo
The homepageVoxVox logo

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Inside the new Supreme Court session: Video Q&A with Ian Millhiser

On October 25, Ian answered questions from our contributors.

by Jacqué Palmer
Updated
An illustration shows the US Supreme Court building, overshadowed by a hand with a judge’s gavel, and surrounded by blue, white, and red shapes suggesting pieces of the American flag.
An illustration shows the US Supreme Court building, overshadowed by a hand with a judge’s gavel, and surrounded by blue, white, and red shapes suggesting pieces of the American flag.
Christina Animashaun/Vox

The Supreme Court has already had a historically influential year. But its next set of rulings might be even more consequential. What will the Court do next?

Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He answered questions from our contributors about the Supreme Court here live on Tuesday, October 25, from 2 pm to 2:45 pm ET.

We can bring you this type of in-depth coverage thanks, in part, to generous gifts from our contributors. Please help support our journalism by giving here.
You can discuss these topics using the chat box below the video. Hit the play button to watch the video stream.

See More:

Most Popular

  1. Donald Trump messed with the wrong pope
  2. Take a mental break with the newest Vox crossword
  3. The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
  4. The Air Quality Index and how to use it, explained
  5. What trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workout

More in Supreme Court

Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
Even this Supreme Court seems unwilling to end birthright citizenshipEven this Supreme Court seems unwilling to end birthright citizenship
Politics

At least seven justices appear to believe that the Fourteenth Amendment means what it says.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
Why an 8-1 Supreme Court just ruled in favor of anti-LGBTQ+ “conversion therapy”Why an 8-1 Supreme Court just ruled in favor of anti-LGBTQ+ “conversion therapy”
Politics

Sadly, the Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar is correct.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The sneaky way Trump’s lawyers are supercharging ICEThe sneaky way Trump’s lawyers are supercharging ICE
Politics

A court just gave awful news to victims of ICE’s occupation of Minneapolis.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court is scared it’s going to break the internetThe Supreme Court is scared it’s going to break the internet
Politics

This is a good thing.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The ugly history behind Trump’s birthright citizenship case in the Supreme CourtThe ugly history behind Trump’s birthright citizenship case in the Supreme Court
Politics

The peculiar legal argument behind Trump’s attack on citizenship was invented by 19th-century anti-Chinese racists.

By Ian Millhiser