Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Taylor Swift puts all her music back on streaming, continues to be a PR genius

2017 DIRECTV NOW Super Saturday Night Concert In Houston - Taylor Swift Performance
2017 DIRECTV NOW Super Saturday Night Concert In Houston - Taylor Swift Performance
Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images for DIRECTV
Constance Grady
Constance Grady is a senior correspondent on the Culture team for Vox, where since 2016 she has covered books, publishing, gender, celebrity analysis, and theater.

As of 12:01 am Eastern, June 9, 2017, you can now stream every Taylor Swift song on all the major streaming services — even Spotify.

As a PR move, this is masterful.

Famously, Swift and Spotify have some bad blood. (Like all pop-culture writers, I am contractually obligated to make that pun in every Taylor Swift article I write; it’s done now and we can all move on.) In 2014, Swift removed her entire back catalog from Spotify’s archives, citing Spotify’s low royalties and refusal to make certain songs more expensive to access than others. “I think that people should feel that there is a value to what musicians have created, and that’s that,” Swift told Time in 2014.

At the time, Swift was at the height of her popularity thus far, and her album 1989 was everywhere. So Swift pulling her music was a major blow for Spotify, who pulled a move from the ninth-grade crush playbook and tried to woo her back with a playlist.

So why is Swift headed back to streaming’s waiting arms now? There are a few possibilities.

The official reason, as announced by the official Instagram account of Swift’s website, is that it’s a simple “thank you” to the fans to mark the occasion of Swift selling 100 million songs worldwide.

A slightly more cynical angle would be to note that Swift has been keeping a conspicuously low profile ever since last July’s Kim Exposed Taylor Party. That moment marked the nadir of Swift’s popularity, and a savvy business woman like Swift knows that the best way to deal with the combination of a negative publicity cycle and massive overexposure is to disappear for a while. So Swift vanished: She even skipped her traditional biannual album release.

It’s been almost a year since Swift went underground, but over the past month or so, Swift appears to have begun testing the waters for a grand re-entry. First, news of a new relationship leaked (allegedly without Swift’s permission). Now this streaming announcement puts Swift back into the headlines, but with a careful distance: She didn’t make the announcement herself, from her personal Instagram account, and it’s written in the third person. It reminds Swift’s fans that they love her, but it isn’t marked by a personal appearance from Swift herself.

There’s a business angle to consider, too. In April, Forbes reported that Spotify was adopting a “windowing” policy, wherein newly released music would be made available only to paid subscribers for two weeks before it was made available to all the peasants with a basic unpaid Spotify subscription. The new policy addresses Swift’s biggest complaint — that Spotify doesn’t place a premium on in-demand music — and Forbes suggested that the change might be enough to bring Swift back to Spotify. We have no way of knowing if this policy change actually did change Swift’s mind or if it’s a coincidence, but the timing is worth noting.

Speaking of timing: Noted Taylor Swift enemy Katy Perry also released her new album, Witness, on June 9. Perry has been building up buzz for months, enduring Carpool Karaoke and poorly thought-out viral marketing schemes involving disco balls. And now, with one fell swoop, Swift appears to be stealing the spotlight for herself.

Now, maybe Swift and Perry have no real beef and concocted this entire story just to boost their profiles and sell albums via a mutually advantageous tabloid drama, and they’re both laughing all the way to the bank. Or maybe the timing is pure coincidence.

Or maybe Taylor Swift really is just that petty.

Whatever Swift’s reasoning, though, the woman’s timing is impeccable. And now you can stream her music everywhere.

More in Culture

Advice
What trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workoutWhat trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workout
Advice

Have we finally unlocked exercise’s biggest secret? Or is this yet another lie perpetrated Big Treadmill?

By Alex Abad-Santos
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
How fan fiction went mainstreamHow fan fiction went mainstream
Podcast
Podcasts

The community that underpins Heated Rivalry, explained.

By Danielle Hewitt and Noel King
Culture
Why Easter never became a big secular holiday like ChristmasWhy Easter never became a big secular holiday like Christmas
Culture

Hint: The Puritans were involved.

By Tara Isabella Burton
Culture
The sticky, sugary history of PeepsThe sticky, sugary history of Peeps
Culture

A few things you might not know about Easter’s favorite candy.

By Tanya Pai
The Highlight
The return of resistance craftingThe return of resistance crafting
The Highlight

Want to fight fascism? Join a knitting circle.

By Anna North