Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why billions of baby chickens are killed every year

It’s not for food! It’s much darker than that.

A newly hatched chick
A newly hatched chick
This newly born chick had better hope it’s not male, because if it is the future is not looking good!
Peter Cross/Getty Images
Dylan Matthews
Dylan Matthews was a senior correspondent and head writer for Vox’s Future Perfect section. He is particularly interested in global health and pandemic prevention, anti-poverty efforts, economic policy and theory, and conflicts about the right way to do philanthropy.

A high court in Germany just ruled in favor of a wildly common, and very cruel, practice at poultry farms across the world: the mass culling of male chicks.

Killing male chicks, who are useless for egg farming purposes, en masse does not violate a German law prohibiting the infliction of pain or harm on animals without “Reasonable cause,” the Court ruled.

The standard practice at hatcheries that supply egg farms with hens is to kill almost all male chicks shortly after birth, usually by grinding them to death, as you can see in this horrifying video:

Hatcheries also sometimes use gassing. Some 4-6 billion male chicks are killed this way, every year, across the world.

The business logic behind chick culling is hard to get around. There’s no reason to keep the male chicks alive; they’re not useful for meat, as broiler chickens are bred in a totally different manner, to maximize size and quantity of meat. In the past, animal welfare advocates have proposed breeding “dual-purpose” chickens, which could be raised humanely for meat as well as serving as hens, to get around this, but got little traction.

But ending chick culling has become possible recently due to technology. In 2016, United Egg Producers, which represents the vast majority of egg producers in the US, announced it would replace culling with “in-ovo egg sexing.” This is a process that can determine the sex of chicks before they develop inside their egg. That enables egg producers to terminate the male eggs and potentially use them to help make vaccines or for pet food (most humans would presumably be grossed out by cooking fertilized eggs). Horrific infanticides will be replaced with humane, painless chicken abortions.

Germany has been at the forefront of this process. The first commercially available eggs using in-ovo selection were produced by SELEGGT GmbH, a German firm founded in 2017. That’s not the only company working on the technology — there’s also the Israeli eggXYt, the Dutch In Ovo, and Texas’s Ovabrite, among others — but they’ve had unusual buy-in from policymakers.

“Once the process is made available to all and the hatcheries have implemented the process, there will be no reason and no justification for chick culling,” Julia Klöckner, the German food and agriculture minister whose ministry helped fund Seleggt, told the press in December. Klöckner has called culling “intolerable from an ethical point of view.”

The German Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig, however, ruled that culling did not run afoul of a German law stating, “No-one shall inflict pain, suffering or harm on a pet without a reasonable cause.” That might change, the court suggested, if “alternative methods are introduced to determine the sex of the chick while it is still in the egg,” but the infancy of the current methods used mean that culling remains legal.

This is a real setback for chickens, but people who care about cruelty to chickens should not lose heart. The technological progress being made toward sex selection means that an outright ban on culling should be feasible soon, and the enthusiasm of mainstream politicians like Klöckner makes it likely in at least a German or European context. The US United Egg Producers, too, seem committed to the change.

Chicks may lost this battle, but they look set to win the war.


Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter. Twice a week, you’ll get a roundup of ideas and solutions for tackling our biggest challenges: improving public health, decreasing human and animal suffering, easing catastrophic risks, and — to put it simply — getting better at doing good.

See More:
Future Perfect
The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.
Future Perfect

Why giving to charity is a better deal if you’re rich.

By Sara Herschander
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Climate
The electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your drivewayThe electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your driveway
Climate

Batteries that could help drive the switch to renewable energy are already, well, driving.

By Matt Simon
Future Perfect
Am I too poor to have a baby?Am I too poor to have a baby?
Future Perfect

How society convinced us that childbearing is morally wrong without a fat budget.

By Sigal Samuel
Future Perfect
How Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in AmericaHow Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in America
Future Perfect

We finally have some good news about housing affordability.

By Marina Bolotnikova
Future Perfect
Ozempic just got cheap enough to change the worldOzempic just got cheap enough to change the world
Future Perfect

Why the $14 drug could reshape global health.

By Pratik Pawar