Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Mississippi will no longer ban calling veggie burgers “veggie burgers”

In response to a lawsuit, the state is revising its regulations.

Veggie burger in a clearly labelled package.
Veggie burger in a clearly labelled package.
Product labels like the one on this veggie burger were banned under a Mississippi law that went into effect July 1.
Getty Images
Kelsey Piper
Kelsey Piper is a contributing editor at Future Perfect, Vox’s effective altruism-inspired section on the world’s biggest challenges. She explores wide-ranging topics like climate change, artificial intelligence, vaccine development, and factory farms, and also writes the Future Perfect newsletter.

It looks like Mississippi is backing down from its proposed law taking aim at meatless meat products in grocery stores.

The state in July had put into effect a law banning stores from labelling products as “veggie burgers,” or using a variety of other common labels like “vegan hot dog” or “tofu bacon.” The law was immediately challenged in court by the makers of meat alternatives.

But the state withdrew those regulations Thursday and proposed new ones that would allow those labels. Under the new regulations, veggie burgers are once more in the clear — along with any product that prominently displays a qualifier like “meat free,” “meatless,” “plant-based,” “veggie-based,” “made from plants,” “vegetarian,” or “vegan.”

Mississippi had justified its earlier prohibition as an attempt to avoid consumer confusion. Consumers seeing a label like “veggie burger” might get confused and think that these products contained beef or pork. But opponents of the law claimed that this was a smokescreen — and the real goal was to crush the plant-based foods that Mississippi farmers perceived as a threat. The First Amendment, they argued, protects labels like “veggie burger” as long as consumers aren’t confused.

“The new proposed regulation is a victory for the First Amendment and for common sense,” said attorney Justin Pearson of the Institute for Justice, which sued over the original veggie burger ban, in a press release.

The rise and fall of the veggie burger label bans

Mississippi isn’t the only state with a law banning the labelling of products as veggie burgers. Missouri led the way with a similar law last year, and Arkansas has since followed suit. Those cases are still making their way through the courts, however, which makes Mississippi the first state to back off from a veggie burger label ban.

Veggie burger products like those from Tofurky (which is suing in Arkansas) and Upton’s Naturals (which sued in Mississippi) have been uneventfully sold in grocery stores all around the country for years (Tofurky was founded in 1995 and Upton’s in 2006). They didn’t come under fire until recently, when sustainability, health, and climate change concerns drove a big increase in interest in meatless meat products.

That surge in interest made producers of slaughtered meat nervous. And in some states, they began pushing back with veggie burger bans. “This bill will protect our cattle farmers from having to compete with products not harvested from an animal,” said Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation president Mike McCormick in January when Mississippi’s veggie burger ban law passed in the Mississippi state House.

The problem, of course, is that state representatives are not supposed to pass laws in order to help protect their cattle farmers from having to compete with other products. And, while the government can regulate commercial speech to protect consumers, strict rules apply to any government-imposed speech restriction. For that reason, every veggie burger ban so far has met with an immediate challenge in court.

Some of these cases will likely be decided in the courts eventually, but in the case of Mississippi, it appears that the state has decided to back off rather than weather an expensive lawsuit. That’s a good thing — for Mississippi, for plant-based meat, and for consumers, who are smart enough to know what a veggie burger is and increasingly interested in eating one.

Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter. Twice a week, you’ll get a roundup of ideas and solutions for tackling our biggest challenges: improving public health, decreasing human and animal suffering, easing catastrophic risks, and — to put it simply — getting better at doing good.

Future Perfect
The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.
Future Perfect

Why giving to charity is a better deal if you’re rich.

By Sara Herschander
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Climate
The electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your drivewayThe electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your driveway
Climate

Batteries that could help drive the switch to renewable energy are already, well, driving.

By Matt Simon
Future Perfect
Am I too poor to have a baby?Am I too poor to have a baby?
Future Perfect

How society convinced us that childbearing is morally wrong without a fat budget.

By Sigal Samuel
Future Perfect
How Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in AmericaHow Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in America
Future Perfect

We finally have some good news about housing affordability.

By Marina Bolotnikova
Future Perfect
Ozempic just got cheap enough to change the worldOzempic just got cheap enough to change the world
Future Perfect

Why the $14 drug could reshape global health.

By Pratik Pawar