Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

AI is resurrecting the voices of dead famous people

If you don’t want a synthesized AI voice outliving you, get a lawyer now.

US-POST-STAMP-ANGELOU
US-POST-STAMP-ANGELOU
The Maya Angelou Forever Stamp is unveiled on April 7, 2015, at a ceremony at the Warner Theater in Washington, DC. Angelou is one of several deceased celebrities whose voice is being synthesized for AI.
Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images
Bryan Walsh
Bryan Walsh is a senior editorial director at Vox overseeing the climate teams and the Unexplainable and The Gray Area podcasts. He is also the editor of Vox’s Future Perfect section and writes the Good News newsletter. He worked at Time magazine for 15 years as a foreign correspondent in Asia, a climate writer, and an international editor, and he wrote a book on existential risk.

Before Franz Kafka died in 1924, he had a simple wish for his friend and literary executor Max Brod: burn all of Kafka’s unpublished writing and papers.

Fortunately for the rest of the world, Brod largely ignored what Kafka had said, which is why today we have works like The Castle and The Trial, not to mention the word “Kafkaesque.” But Kafka’s story does raise the question of what rights artists, musicians, writers, and celebrities more generally should have over their work once they die. And those questions are going to be more important in the age of AI, when it’s not just someone’s work that could live on after them, but their actual voice.

Michael Caine talks like this

The AI audio startup ElevenLabs, which generates amazingly realistic synthetic speech, just rolled out an “Iconic Voices” marketplace that lets companies legally license AI versions of well-known voices — some living, many deceased — for ads and other content.

Related

On the living side, the actors Matthew McConaughey and Michael Caine have both signed on. McConaughey — an investor in the company — plans to use his synthetic voice to translate his “Lyrics of Livin’” newsletter into Spanish, which shows how the technology can be used to localize content across the world. (Muy bien, muy bien, muy bien, as Spanish AI McConaughey might put it.) Caine, one of the most celebrated actors in England, is joining the marketplace as a marquee voice and has argued that the move should be seen as amplifying human storytellers, not replacing them.

As weird as it is to imagine an AI speaking with Caine’s inimitable Cockney accent — and frankly, no AI can do Caine better than these two guys in The Trip — at least he made the active choice while alive to sign it away. But ElevenLabs has also struck estate deals that let users hear narration in the voices of historical figures, like Judy Garland, James Dean, Maya Angelou, and AI pioneer Alan Turing. (That’s right, the genius who once said that if computers became smarter than humans, “we should, as a species, feel greatly humbled,” will now be lending his posthumous voice to the machines.)

This is a long way from projecting a holographic Tupac Shakur for a “duet” with Snoop Dogg at Coachella in 2012. We’re generating new readings in the vocal style of someone who can’t consent today.

The incentives are obvious. Synthetic voices are cheaper than staging a hologram tour and more scalable than booking an A-list narrator. With a modest archive, you can generate hours of multilingual audio that sounds plausibly like the original. In the company’s defense, ElevenLabs says its marketplace routes everything through deceased figures’ rights holders to address ethics and misuse concerns. That means heirs get paid, and it’s better than a deepfake AI-for-all, but the core fact remains: Once a voice is an asset, the estate becomes a product manager for a digital ghost.

Send in the lawyers

This is where the Kafka lesson comes in. If you’re a famous person who wants control over posthumous AI content based on yourself — or really anyone who works in creative fields — get an estate lawyer to write those demands down now. Do you permit the creation of a synthetic voice after death? If so, for what? Are archival restorations and documentaries okay, but not ads, political content, or interactive chatbots? Who holds the kill switch: a literary executor, a family council, an independent trustee? If you don’t want your AI voice talking on ChatGPT 55.7 in 2060, don’t leave that decision to a board meeting taking place well after you’ve ended up on the Oscars “In Memoriam” segment.

Kafka’s fame is a standing argument that, sometimes, betraying an artist’s last wish serves the world. But if you, famous person, absolutely don’t want to leave the fate of your voice to chance, learn from the example of British fantasy novelist Terry Pratchett. Per his very specific wishes, a hard drive containing his unfinished books was ceremoniously flattened by a steamroller in 2017. Try reconstructing that.

A version of this story originally appeared in the Future Perfect newsletter. Sign up here!

Future Perfect
The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.The tax code rewards generosity. But probably not yours.
Future Perfect

Why giving to charity is a better deal if you’re rich.

By Sara Herschander
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Climate
The electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your drivewayThe electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your driveway
Climate

Batteries that could help drive the switch to renewable energy are already, well, driving.

By Matt Simon
Future Perfect
Am I too poor to have a baby?Am I too poor to have a baby?
Future Perfect

How society convinced us that childbearing is morally wrong without a fat budget.

By Sigal Samuel
Future Perfect
How Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in AmericaHow Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in America
Future Perfect

We finally have some good news about housing affordability.

By Marina Bolotnikova
Future Perfect
Ozempic just got cheap enough to change the worldOzempic just got cheap enough to change the world
Future Perfect

Why the $14 drug could reshape global health.

By Pratik Pawar