Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Reddit made over $100,000 off stolen celebrity nudes

Kate Upton was one of the women whose photos were stolen
Kate Upton was one of the women whose photos were stolen
Kate Upton was one of the women whose photos were stolen
Brad Barket/Getty Images

Many people who viewed the stolen photos of Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence last week did so on Reddit. Consequently, those photos sent a flood of traffic to the site, and in under a week, made it enough money to pay its substantial server costs for a month, according to investigations by Wired. That number comes out, according to estimates on Reddit, to more than $160,000, not including advertising revenue.

Personal photos of dozens of celebrities were stolen from their computers and posted onto the site 4chan, where they quickly garnered public attention. Lawyers for the affected women quickly began trying to remove the photos from the internet, and as a result the photos found a home on a subreddit titled r/TheFappening. The photos circulated there for days before site moderators shut the subreddit down.

Users on Reddit have the option to pay for Reddit "gold." It costs $3.99 per month, and is used to pay for server time on the site. Reddit users typically gift "gold" to one another. Based on estimates of how much of that "gold" was shared on The Fappening's subreddit, the founder, John Menese, told Wired that the forum made enough money to power Reddit for a month.

“If Reddit had wanted to, they could have banned us on Sunday when our traffic broke their servers,” Menese told Wired. “Instead, they chose to milk a week of publicity and a month of server time in Reddit gold before they stepped in.”

The self proclaimed “front page of the internet” might believe in barely constrained freedom of speech as much as it says it does, but if it doesn’t, then it almost certainly believes in money.

More in Culture

Good Medicine
The alcohol crisis quietly hitting high-stress, “high-status” workersThe alcohol crisis quietly hitting high-stress, “high-status” workers
Good Medicine

What The Pitt can teach us about addiction.

By Dylan Scott
Advice
What trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workoutWhat trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workout
Advice

Have we finally unlocked exercise’s biggest secret? Or is this yet another lie perpetrated Big Treadmill?

By Alex Abad-Santos
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
How fan fiction went mainstreamHow fan fiction went mainstream
Podcast
Podcasts

The community that underpins Heated Rivalry, explained.

By Danielle Hewitt and Noel King
Culture
Why Easter never became a big secular holiday like ChristmasWhy Easter never became a big secular holiday like Christmas
Culture

Hint: The Puritans were involved.

By Tara Isabella Burton
Culture
The sticky, sugary history of PeepsThe sticky, sugary history of Peeps
Culture

A few things you might not know about Easter’s favorite candy.

By Tanya Pai