Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Voters in Arizona had to wait in line for hours to cast ballots. Here’s why that matters.

Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images

On Tuesday evening, as polls closed in Arizona, reports began emerging that voters in the state’s most populous county, Maricopa County, were waiting in hours-long lines to cast ballots.

Aracely Calderon, a 56-year-old woman living in Phoenix, became the last person to cast a vote, at 12:12 am local time, after waiting five hours in line. Calderon, who was born in Guatemala, became a naturalized citizen in 2012.

“I’m here to exercise my right to vote,” she told the Arizona Republic, explaining why she had waited in a line that spanned more than 700 people and four city blocks. Many other would-be voters, discouraged by the lines or unable to wait because of work schedules, never cast ballots.

The excessive wait times resulted from a decision by Maricopa County officials to cut the number of polling places available across the county by 70 percent — from 200 in 2012 to just 60 in Tuesday’s election. That meant that across the county, each polling place served more than 21,000 eligible voters.

Under the Voting Rights Act, this wouldn’t have happened

One polling place for 21,000 eligible voters is already stretching resources pretty thin. According to a report from the 2014 election administration and voter survey, each polling location in the US served an average of 1,700 eligible voters.

But the distribution of polling places was also uneven, with more precincts placed in white neighborhoods than ones where more minority voters live. In Phoenix, where the majority of residents are Hispanic, black, or another minority, each polling place served 108,000 residents. In Peoria, a city with a majority white population, each polling location was allocated to 54,000 residents.

Before 2013, Maricopa would have had to seek permission from the US Justice Department to alter its number of polling places. That’s because Arizona was one of 16 states where jurisdictions with a long history of voter discrimination had to submit any voting procedure changes under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

Since 1975, the Justice Department has barred 22 voting changes from taking effect in Arizona because they would have negatively impacted the state’s Native American and Hispanic voters. Also in 2013, the Supreme Court overturned Arizona’s notorious voter ID law, which would have made it harder for foreign-born citizens to register to vote.

But in 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Holder that the Voting Rights Act unfairly discriminated against states required to check voting changes with the federal government, essentially cutting the teeth out of the civil rights-era law.

Since that decision, jurisdictions like Maricopa County have been free to make any voting changes they saw fit, without regard to how they might affect minority voters. Hence how the situation got so bad in Phoenix on Tuesday.

The Justice Department still does have jurisdiction to open investigations into individual cases of fraud, and on Wednesday, Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton wrote the department a letter asking for them to look into the situation.

“Throughout the county, but especially in Phoenix, thousands of citizens waited in line for three, four, and even five hours to vote,” Stanton said. “Many more could simply not afford to wait that long, and went home.”

The long lines are particularly notable because they represent one of the first major mishaps in the first presidential election year in more than 50 years without Voting Rights Act protections. It’s fair to expect, then, that Arizona is not a one-time example of incompetence, but rather the first in a string of incidents to come.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters