Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A bracket to determine the most influential American who never became president

George McGovern: How influential has he been?
George McGovern: How influential has he been?
George McGovern: How influential has he been?
Kevin Winter/Getty Images

Who was more influential in American history, Earl Warren or Colin Powell? Did Barry Goldwater or George McGovern have a greater legacy on the American party system? Who left a bigger imprint on modern domestic policy, Newt Gingrich or Sandra Day O’Connor?

If these are the sorts of questions that keep you up at night, I have good news for you. Political scientist Michael Miller (with some help from historian Ken Owen) has developed a bracket tournament pitting 64 leading non-presidents against one another. The tournament is being played out on Twitter at the hashtag #bestnonpres, and the first round of voting has already started. Anyone can participate. The contest culminates with a final matchup on December 2.

Download the bracket.

(© Michael Miller)

Who actually got to be among the 64 candidates? The rule Miller and Owen came up with was that it had to be a politician (someone who ran for public office, served in a presidential Cabinet, or was on the Supreme Court) who was eligible for the presidency and could have plausibly attained it under the right circumstances. They excluded people who died during George Washington’s presidency, as that really wasn’t much of an open contest.

How do you actually decide who’s the more influential non-president? That’s kind of hard to say, and Miller has left it up to participants to figure out what it means. I thought it a bit rude to put Alexander Hamilton up against the man who killed him, Aaron Burr, but it seems pretty clear to me that Hamilton has had a far greater influence in American history, particularly on the nation’s monetary system.

But what about George Marshall (former secretary of state, secretary of defense, and recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for his innovative plan to aid European nations after World War II) versus Eleanor Roosevelt (first lady, human rights activist, delegate to the UN, chair of the UN Commission on Human Rights, and chair of JFK’s Presidential Commission on the Status of Women)? That’s a tough call.

It’s also hard to decide between people like Roger Taney and Winfield Scott. Taney, the chief justice who authored the infamous Dred Scott decision in 1857, probably did more than almost any other single person to bring about the Civil War. That’s certainly influential but also somewhat execrable.

Anyway, you get to decide just what influential means to you. Be sure to participate — the first round will end soon.

Mischiefs of Faction
Brazil’s Supreme Court pushed back against an attempt to cancel participatory councilsBrazil’s Supreme Court pushed back against an attempt to cancel participatory councils
Mischiefs of Faction

That’s good news for Brazilian democracy.

By Carla Bezerra and Lindsay Mayka
Mischiefs of Faction
Six political scientists react to the first Democratic primary debatesSix political scientists react to the first Democratic primary debates
Mischiefs of Faction

A good event for the upper tier of candidates, a bad one for Biden, and a forgettable one for the ones you’ve already forgotten.

By Richard Skinner, Seth Masket and 4 more
Mischiefs of Faction
Technology and transparency: the path to a modern Congress?Technology and transparency: the path to a modern Congress?
Mischiefs of Faction

We’re starting to see the direction of a committee dedicated to changing Capitol Hill.

By Richard Skinner
Mischiefs of Faction
Brazil’s Bolsonaro took a page from US politics by dangling the possibility of an evangelical Supreme Court JusticeBrazil’s Bolsonaro took a page from US politics by dangling the possibility of an evangelical Supreme Court Justice
Mischiefs of Faction

But US evangelicals have been more loyal to Trump than Brazil’s evangelicals have been to President Bolsonaro, so this move may not work.

By Amy Erica Smith
Mischiefs of Faction
What’s motivating the DNC’s debate rulesWhat’s motivating the DNC’s debate rules
Mischiefs of Faction

Democrats are trying to learn from 2016 and prevent the same problems in the nomination race.

By Seth Masket
Mischiefs of Faction
Why everyone runs for president these daysWhy everyone runs for president these days
Mischiefs of Faction

For the second presidential cycle in a row, there’s a record-breaking number of candidates in the nominee race.

By Rachel Bitecofer