Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Donald Trump’s favorite tax is bad for the poor

One of Donald Trump’s signature policy proposals is to raise tariffs — he likes to call to call them “border taxes.” The president-elect hasn’t announced a specific proposal yet. But transition officials have said that they’re considering a 10 percent across-the-board tariff on everything imported into the United States — an effort to prevent manufacturers from moving working-class manufacturing jobs overseas.

But as Trump considers the proposal, he should keep in mind this chart, which shows that the tariffs we already have hit low-income Americans the hardest:

This chart comes from new research by Jason Furman, President Obama’s top economic adviser, and economists Katheryn Russ and Jay Shambaugh. The trio conducted a detailed analysis of current tariff rates and matched them up with data on spending by income decile.

As you can see, tariffs cut into the incomes of high-income households by less than 0.3 percent. Households further down the income distribution spend a significantly higher share of their incomes on them. The researchers warn that there are “well-known data quality issues with respect to the ratio of consumption to income for very low-income households,” so that bottom bar should be “interpreted with caution.” Regardless, the trend here is clear: Tariffs impose bigger burdens on households with lower incomes.

The kind of 10 percent across-the-board tariff that team Trump has suggested would significantly raise the cost of living for almost every American. It wouldn’t have exactly the same distributional impact as this chart shows — it’s possible that rich people would bear a larger share of the burden than with current tariffs. Still, the research is a reminder that tariffs impose significant costs for consumers at the lowest rungs of the economic ladder.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s ceasefire announcement, briefly explainedTrump’s ceasefire announcement, briefly explained
The Logoff

An Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is set to take effect Thursday evening.

By Cameron Peters
Podcasts
What to know about the Israel-Lebanon conflictWhat to know about the Israel-Lebanon conflict
Podcast
Podcasts

A journalist explains what it’s like in Lebanon right now.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Today, Explained newsletter
Trump’s bungled Iran negotiations didn’t have to go this wayTrump’s bungled Iran negotiations didn’t have to go this way
Today, Explained newsletter

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. She sees several areas where Trump is going wrong.

By Caitlin Dewey
The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King