Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Uber could be facing 2 federal criminal investigations

TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2014 - Day 1
TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2014 - Day 1
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick.
Photo by Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch

A federal judge in California has asked the US Department of Justice to investigate whether Uber should face criminal prosecution for the alleged theft of self-driving car secrets from Google’s Waymo spinoff. It’s the latest escalation in a bitter legal conflict between the two companies.

The dispute centers on the actions of Anthony Levandowski. He’s an early member of Google’s self-driving car team who left Waymo in early 2016 to start a company that was quickly snapped up by Uber. Waymo says Levandowski stole a large amount of sensitive technical information from Waymo on his way out the door and incorporated Waymo’s designs into Uber’s own self-driving technology. Waymo sued Uber in February.

Now Judge William Alsup, the California judge overseeing the case, has asked federal prosecutors to look into Waymo’s allegations. He took no position on whether prosecution was warranted, but evidently believes there’s enough evidence to justify having the feds take a look.

Alsup’s referral comes just a week after news broke that Uber is facing a federal investigation over a totally different controversy: Uber’s use of software called “Greyball” to mislead local regulators who were trying to enforce taxi laws as Uber was entering new markets. Uber now says it has discontinued the use of the software.

Neither of these investigations will necessarily lead to criminal charges actually being filed. Prosecutors might conclude that Uber did nothing wrong or that there wasn’t enough evidence for a conviction. Still, the embattled ride-sharing company, which has faced multiple scandals this year and is still far from profitability, doesn’t need any more problems.

Disclosure: My brother works at Google.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel