Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Obama’s case for Hillary Clinton is really a case for Barack Obama

President Obama appeared in North Carolina on Wednesday to stump for Hillary Clinton. And to explain the stakes in the election, he asked his audience to remember how the world looked eight years ago.

“You may not remember exactly where we were as a country when I visited Raleigh in the final days of the 2008 campaign,” Obama said. “We were living through two long wars. We were in the early days of the worst economic crisis in 80 years. The economy was teetering on the edge of a great depression.”

But under his leadership, Obama argued, America “turned the page” and enacting policies that have benefited millions. And to preserve that legacy, he argued, American voters needed to choose Hillary Clinton as his successor.

Obama rattled off the major accomplishments of his presidency: “Last year, incomes rose faster than any time since at least 1968.” Poverty fell. The economy gained 15 million jobs, and 20 million people gained health insurance.

“We took out Osama bin Laden, made sure that in all 50 states people have the freedom to marry who they love. We did that,” he said.

Obama described Hillary Clinton as the “only candidate in this race who has devoted her entire life to lifting up that better America.”

However, he warned, “All the progress that we’ve made over the last eight years, all the progress we hope to make over the next eight years — all of that goes out the window if we don’t win this election.”

Obama sees the election as a referendum on his presidency

It’s unusual for a sitting two-term president to stump so aggressively for his successor. In the fall of 2008, for example, George W. Bush was viewed unfavorably by most Americans, so John McCain’s campaign didn’t welcome him on the campaign trail. Al Gore kept the popular president at arm’s length during the 2000 campaign, while Ronald Reagan wasn’t enthusiastic about the candidacy of his vice president, George H.W. Bush, in 1988.

But things are different this year. Obama is more popular than Hillary Clinton, the economy is doing fairly well, and the two have a strong rapport. So Clinton is campaigning on the continuation of Obama’s policies, and she’s happy to have him out campaigning for her. And Obama is happy to do it, because he sees the election, in part, as a referendum on his presidency.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters