Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump is bragging that his executive order caused health care stocks to drop

He’s spiking the football after causing a lose-lose-lose situation.

President Donald Trump took to Twitter Saturday morning to celebrate after taking active steps to sabotage Obamacare — and he’s using the stock market as an affirmation for his decision.

On Thursday, the White House announced it would end Obamacare subsidies that help low-income Americans pay for health insurance. On Friday, health care stocks took a sharp dive. And on Saturday, Trump tweeted this:

Several folks on Twitter pointed out how odd it is that the president just spiked the football after sabotaging an entire industry:

But more than that, he just spiked the football after creating a lose-lose-lose situation, which is how my colleague Sarah Kliff describes it.

Why is Trump congratulating himself for the stock market falling?

Trump is treating the stock dip as an indication of a win because these cost-sharing subsidies, or CSRs, are actually paid out to insurance companies, which is likely why Trump is calling it a “windfall.”

But it’s not free money; the funds help insurers offset the lowering copays and deductibles for low-income Americans under Obamacare — people making up to 250 percent of the federal poverty level, which is about $30,000 for a single person. In short, it’s money that helps more people afford health insurance.

The reason the White House can just stop payments to insurance companies is because of a 2014 lawsuit filed by House Republicans, which alleged CSR payments were illegal because Congress never approved the payments in a separate spending bill.

A federal judge agreed — but suspended the decisions so the Obama administration could appeal. Soon thereafter, Trump won the election and House Republicans asked the judge to postpone the lawsuit to allow the new administration to figure out what to do. (My colleague Dylan Scott has a comprehensive explainer here.)

Trump is also claiming this will expand access. The CBO says otherwise.

Trump also tweeted this Saturday morning:

As Kliff writes, this decision is a bad situation for, well, everyone — and the Congressional Budget Office projects that it would do the opposite of expanding access.

  • It will raise premiums by an estimated 20 percent.
  • It increases the national deficit and will cost the federal government $194 billion over the next decade.
  • And cause about a million people to lose coverage.

In addition, it even hurts insurance companies, especially those who didn’t assume Trump would take this action and adjust prices accordingly.

Now, to be clear, it doesn’t change much for people receiving Obamacare subsidies — those earning up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level, which works out to about $48,000 for an individual. That’s because Obamacare puts a cap on how much those people can pay.

It does hurt people who are buying their coverage on the exchange and don’t get any subsidies. Some insurance companies have already adjusted their premium prices on these largely middle-income Americans to offset the federal payments they won’t receive.

Of course, Congress could act to reinstate the CSR payments, and as Dylan Scott writes:

Now, following the failure of Senate Republicans to repeal the law, an increasing number of them are turning toward a bipartisan health care solution — one that is likely to include funding for CSRs. Top Senate Republicans and Democrats had neared an agreement on an Obamacare fix package which would fund the payments, but they have not yet finalized a deal that could be brought up for a vote.

Read more

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters