Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Sen. Chuck Grassley wants to require sexual harassment training in the Senate

He called for the “immediate implementation of a policy requiring all new Senate employees” to get training.

Lawmakers Return To Washington To Heavy Legislative Agenda
Lawmakers Return To Washington To Heavy Legislative Agenda
Sen. Chuck Grassley.
Alex Wong/Getty Images

As Congress comes under increased scrutiny as a breeding ground for workplace harassment, top Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is pushing to make anti-sexual-harassment training mandatory on Capitol Hill.

“I am convinced that sexual harassment training is vitally important to maintaining a respectful and productive working environment in Congress,” Grassley wrote in a letter to the Senate Rules Committee Tuesday.

He went on to urge a policy change, calling for the “immediate implementation of a policy requiring all new Senate employees” as well as “all current employees who have not yet received training” to go through online or in-person sexual harassment training. Currently, no one in the Capitol is required to undergo harassment training. Evidence shows harassment training is useful for identifying harassment, but not in preventing it.

His move follows efforts from Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA), who started a video campaign last week urging members and staff to come forward with their stories of sexual harassment in the Capitol. In 2014, Speier introduced legislation that would mandate members and staff undergo harassment training.

While national media homed in on the details of the Harvey Weinstein case in mid-October, reports from Politico and Washington Post have shown, rather unsurprisingly, that it’s a problem pervasive in the Washington power center. Congress didn’t develop a reporting system for harassment until 1995, after Republican Sen. Bob Packwood resigned in disgrace over harassment claims. Grassley penned the 1995 Congressional Accountability Act, which enacted civil rights, labor, workplace safety, and health laws to Congress and agencies under the legislative branch.

It appears as though there’s more work to be done.

Congress is a breeding ground for harassment

There are certain factors that lead to higher levels of workplace harassment:

  • In male-dominated environments, women experience high levels of harassment.
  • Workplaces that revolve around the approval of a powerful figure of authority create a risk for harassment.
  • Those in low-wage positions experience high levels of harassment because they do not have bargaining power to push back.

Congress checks those boxes.

“Wherever there are big power disparities with people working closely together, that is a risk factor for work place harassment,” Emily Martin, general counsel and vice president of workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center, said. “When you have a congressman working with a woman who is in her first job after college, that is a dynamic that can risk work place harassment.”

Working relationships are currency on Capitol Hill, where the future of people’s careers hinges on supporting a person in power. Staff positions are low-paid and have high turnover — and moving jobs often requires having a good reputation.

For those experiencing harassment, there’s a constant fear of tarnishing that reputation. And it’s a well-founded concern — a 2015 analysis of complaints to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shows 75 percent of women who report harassment experience retaliation, a real fear on Capitol Hill.

“I was in the position of having no choice but reacting in a way that was going to make a big deal out of it in front his staff or his wife, or acting like nothing was happening. I chose the latter,” Ally Coll Steele, a former Democratic senator’s intern, told the Washington Post about the senator grabbing her buttocks at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.

Time and time again, these stories come to the surface. In 2015, Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX) settled a sexual harassment case with his former communications director Lauren Greene after a series of inappropriate comments. Farenthold still holds office. In 2011, Rep. John Ensign (R-NV) resigned after acknowledging having an affair with a staffer. In 2010, Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) resigned after allegations that he had groped a male staffer. In 2014, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) shared personal accounts of sexual harassment from her Senate colleagues. The list goes on.

For many staffers, the best solution is often to change offices, a practice that can allow a serial offender to affect more individuals. There’s no question that most cases in Congress are going unreported.

Solutions are few and far between. Speier’s 2014 attempt to mandate members and staff undergo harassment training went unanswered. Now Speier is planning to introduce legislation to revamp Congress’s oversight entity, and is encouraging people to come forward with their own stories.

“The chief of staff held my face kissed me and stuck his tongue in my mouth,” Speier said in a video campaign calling on congressional staffers and members to share their experiences of harassment. “I know what it’s like to keep these things hidden deep down inside. … Congress has been a breeding ground for a hostile work environment for far too long.”

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s big marijuana moveTrump’s big marijuana move
The Logoff

Rescheduling medical marijuana, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Netanyahu may finally be in troubleNetanyahu may finally be in trouble
Politics

The Israeli leader faces an uphill battle in this year’s elections.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Trump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explainedTrump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explained
The Logoff

Afghan refugees currently in Qatar could be sent to Congo by the Trump administration.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The wide-ranging fallout from the Supreme Court’s new terrorism decision, explainedThe wide-ranging fallout from the Supreme Court’s new terrorism decision, explained
Politics

The Court’s Republican majority fractured in a case that could impact everyone from immigrants to consumers.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide if migrants can be sent back to war zonesThe Supreme Court will decide if migrants can be sent back to war zones
Politics

When can the Trump administration strip legal protections from migrants who risk death in their home countries?

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.
Politics

Trump’s gerrymandering efforts are backfiring.

By Christian Paz