Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

“We are friends”: Rep. Al Green’s bizarre attempt to get ahead of sexual misconduct allegations

The statement apparently goes back to an accusation over a 2007 incident.

Rep. Al Green at the Democratic National Convention in 2012.
Rep. Al Green at the Democratic National Convention in 2012.
Rep. Al Green at the Democratic National Convention in 2012.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Rep. Al Green (D-TX) really wants the world to know that he and Lucinda Daniels, a former staffer, are friends.

Really. That’s just about the only thing Green’s new statement on the topic — which mentioned that Daniels and he are “consenting friends” — made clear. It read:

In the present climate, we wish to jointly quiet any curious minds about our former and present relationship with one another. We are friends, and have long been friends. At an unfortunate time in our lives, when both of our feelings were hurt, we hastily made allegations and charges against one another that have been absolutely resolved. As consenting friends, we both regret our former claims and have since then maintained our respectful friendship. We are friends.

This matter has been resolved without payment of any money or transfer of any consideration of any kind by either of us to the other. As friends, we have both agreed that we see no need to make further statements regarding this absolutely resolved matter.

The November 2017 statement is signed by both Daniels and Green, seemingly in an attempt to preempt any new reporting on this case.

Their statement comes as more high-profile men face allegations of sexual assault and harassment following a string of accusations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. Recently, two women accused Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) of groping, and Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) was accused of sexual harassment in a case that was quietly resolved through a congressional office that uses taxpayer money to settle such allegations.

Apparently Green and Daniels, the former director of the Congress member’s Houston office, were trying to get ahead of reporting on their own conflict. Daniels alleged that Green had sexually assaulted her in 2007. In 2008, Green responded with a lawsuit that claimed Daniels threatened to sue him for discrimination if he didn’t pay her.

Then Daniels reportedly signed a written agreement dismissing her accusations against Green. That led Green to drop his lawsuit within months of filing it, reportedly without any payment.

Although Green acknowledged a “romantic encounter” in 2007, his spokesperson has denied that Green assaulted Daniels. Green’s communications director also said that the conflict never directly involved the congressional office or taxpayer money.

But as accusations of sexual misconduct have continued to pop up, that apparently made Green and Daniels nervous. So now we have this bizarre statement.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters