Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Office of Government Ethics wants Kellyanne Conway to be disciplined

Libby Nelson
Libby Nelson was Vox’s editorial director, politics and policy, leading coverage of how government action and inaction shape American life. Libby has more than a decade of policy journalism experience, including at Inside Higher Ed and Politico. She joined Vox in 2014.

When White House adviser Kellyanne Conway told the audience of Fox & Friends to “go buy Ivanka’s stuff” last week, referring to President Trump’s daughter, it seemed like a clear violation of government ethics rules. The Office of Government Ethics’ director agrees — and he wants the White House to investigate and discipline Conway.

“I’m going to give a free commercial here,” Conway said from the podium of the White House briefing room on February 9. “Go buy it today, everybody. You can find it online.”

“There is strong reason to believe that Ms. Conway has violated the Standards of Conduct and that disciplinary action is warranted,” Walter Shaub, the director of the Office of Government Ethics, wrote in a letter addressed to Stefan Passantino, the deputy White House counsel who is Trump’s top ethics official.

The letter, obtained by NBC News, makes clear that Conway and other officials were trained on ethics guidelines before President Trump took office:

The federal government can punish employees by giving them an official letter of warning or “counseling,” suspending them without pay, demoting them, or even firing them.

Press secretary Sean Spicer said at the time that Conway was “counseled.” But the ethics office hasn’t been informed about any official disciplinary action, Shaub noted in the letter. He gave Passantino a deadline of February 28 to investigate and to report back on the matter and any disciplinary measures the White House will take.

This is about as much as Shaub is able to do. The Office of Government Ethics can direct a federal agency to investigate. If the White House ignores the request and lets the deadline pass, the matter could go to a hearing, where a judge could recommend a punishment for Conway. (The ethics office’s counsel could also weigh in on the matter himself.) In the end, though, it would be just a recommendation. It’s not binding. Actually punishing Conway is still up to Trump himself.


Watch: Kellyanne Conway’s interview tricks, explained

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters