Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Tom Perez went from “the process was rigged” against Bernie to “I misspoke” in under a day

Jacob Lew, Treasury Host Financial Literacy And Education Meeting
Jacob Lew, Treasury Host Financial Literacy And Education Meeting
DNC Chair candidate Tom Perez
Photo by Pete Marovich/Getty Images

One might think that the last thing a candidate vying to lead the Democratic Party would want to do is revive the divisions that pitted supporters of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders against each other during the 2016 presidential primary.

And yet that is exactly what Tom Perez, one of the leading contenders for chair of the Democratic National Committee, did on Wednesday. Perez, Obama’s former labor secretary, endorsed Sanders’s supporters long-standing claim that the primary was “rigged” against the Vermont senator — a line Clinton backers have long derided as a deluded conspiracy theory.

“We heard loudly and clearly yesterday from Bernie supporters that the process was rigged, and it was. And you’ve got to be honest about it,” Perez told a group of Democratic lawmakers in Kansas, according to a report by MSNBC’s Alex Seitz-Wald.

By late Wednesday night, Perez was furiously backing off the comments. On Twitter, he said that he had “misspoke” and clarified that Clinton had won “fair and square” — but that it was essential for the next DNC chair to be transparent to avoid the perception that “a thumb was placed on the scale.”

Perez, it’s worth noting, is generally seen as having the Obama and Clinton wings of the party behind him. But his leading opponent for the position, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), endorsed Sanders during the primary and has the strong backing of both the Vermont senator and Sanders allies in the media. (The third leading choice, Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana, has pitched himself as a consensus candidate to prevent the race from becoming a referendum on the primary.)

This dynamic has put Perez in the position of needing to say things that sound appealing and nonthreatening to the Sanders wing of the party, and Ellison in the position of needing to say things that sound appealing and nonthreatening to the Clinton wing of the party. The risk of going too hard after the other side, as Perez demonstrated, is that it can undermine certain “friend”-ships — and force you to clarify where you stand.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
Virginia voters just handed Democrats another win in the Great Redistricting WarsVirginia voters just handed Democrats another win in the Great Redistricting Wars
Politics

Trump’s gerrymandering efforts are backfiring.

By Christian Paz
The Logoff
Why the Pentagon is dropping a flu vaccine mandateWhy the Pentagon is dropping a flu vaccine mandate
The Logoff

US soldiers are now free to get the flu.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The war in Iran isn’t ending — it’s becoming something newThe war in Iran isn’t ending — it’s becoming something new
Politics

Why this conflict is so hard to end.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
The lucky few who can apply for tariff refundsThe lucky few who can apply for tariff refunds
Politics

The Trump administration launched its tariff refund portal. Will the refunds really happen?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
Pete Hegseth’s spiritual leader explains his radical faithPete Hegseth’s spiritual leader explains his radical faith
Podcast
Podcasts

The Christian nationalist pastor swaying the Trump administration discusses Trump, Iran, and the pope.

By Jolie Myers and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser