Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Republican health plan still has an exemption for legislators’ insurance

House GOP members have said they’ll close this loophole. It’s still in the American Health Care Act.

House Republicans will vote on a health care bill today that lets states get rid of some of Obamacare’s requirements, such as preventing insurers from charging people higher prices based on preexisting conditions — but it keeps those protections in place for insurance plans that cover members of Congress and their staff.

The loophole would mean that legislators could keep certain Obamacare protections — including the protections for preexisting conditions and a requirement to cover “essential health benefits” — that states could relax for other insurance plans covering Obamacare enrollees.

The loophole was first included in an amendment to the American Health Care Act offered by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ) last week. After Vox reported on the exemption, MacArthur offered legislation to fix it and make Congress subject to the same rules as the rest of health law enrollees.

A leadership aide says the House will vote on the bill to close the loophole today, around the same time they vote on the American Health Care Act.

The bill to fix the exemption, however, would need 60 votes to pass the Senate and overcome a filibuster. Congressional Republicans do not believe they can run that bill through the reconciliation process that they will use for the overall health care bill, which only need 51 votes to pass.

This means there is a decent chance that even if the American Health Care Act passed the Senate, the fix to close the loophole for legislators still might not. It’s hard to see Democrats offering up the eight votes Republicans would need to get to 60 to address this problem in the bill.

Read more about the loophole here.

More in Politics

Politics
The war in Iran isn’t ending — it’s becoming something newThe war in Iran isn’t ending — it’s becoming something new
Politics

Why this conflict is so hard to end.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
The lucky few who can apply for tariff refundsThe lucky few who can apply for tariff refunds
Politics

The Trump administration launched its tariff refund portal. Will the refunds really happen?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
Pete Hegseth’s spiritual leader explains his radical faithPete Hegseth’s spiritual leader explains his radical faith
Podcast
Podcasts

The Christian nationalist pastor swaying the Trump administration discusses Trump, Iran, and the pope.

By Jolie Myers and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
Israel’s critics are winning the battle for the Democratic PartyIsrael’s critics are winning the battle for the Democratic Party
Politics

Democratic voters turned against Israel. Now their politicians are following.

By Andrew Prokop
America, Actually
Rubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it nowRubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it now
America, Actually

An interview with the senator Swalwell called his “best friend.”

By Astead Herndon