Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Kellyanne Conway’s husband is now criticizing President Trump on Twitter

Until recently, George Conway III was being considered for a top Trump administration job.

MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

A well-connected conservative lawyer raised eyebrows in Washington Monday morning, as George Conway III — husband of top White House adviser Kellyanne Conway, and until recently under consideration for a top job in President Donald Trump’s Justice Department — publicly criticized the president.

Conway was responding to a Monday morning presidential Twitter rant in which Trump criticized his own Justice Department for revising his “travel ban” on people from several predominantly Muslim countries.

“These tweets may make some ppl feel better, but they certainly won’t help OSG [Office of the Solicitor General] get 5 votes in SCOTUS, which is what actually matters. Sad,” Conway tweeted in response to Trump.

Conway’s account hasn’t tweeted in over a year, but the Washington Post’s Matt Zapotosky says Conway has confirmed to him that it is authentic.

The background to this is that after the first version of Trump’s “ban” was blocked in court, the administration withdrew it and submitted an altered version it hoped could better withstand legal scrutiny. But in doing so, they’ve tried to argue that this is a new policy and that its legality should be judged independently from the president’s statements about older versions of the “ban.” Conway is saying tweets and public statements like this from Trump could prove problematic for government lawyers who are making that case in court (a topic Vox’s Dara Lind wrote about this morning).

The argument isn’t really new, but the fact that it’s Conway who’s making it is rather striking. He was reportedly a contender for the solicitor general job and since March has been said to be the top contender to lead the Department of Justice’s civil division under Trump. It was only last week that Conway took his name out of consideration for the post, citing family reasons. It remains unclear whether there’s more to the story here, but no matter what went down, it’s highly unusual for a top White House staffer’s spouse who was about to officially join the administration to chide the president on Twitter.

Update: Conway has elaborated on his opinions further, saying he still supports Trump and is criticizing him for undermining his own agenda by tweeting too much on legal matters:

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters