Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Newt Gingrich just revealed what the Kavanaugh fight was really about

The former Republican House speaker suggested Kavanaugh would help stop the release of Trump’s tax returns if Democrats subpoena them.

Dentons NAFTA 2.0 Summit
Dentons NAFTA 2.0 Summit
former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Dentons

Republicans fought tooth and nail to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court in spite of serious allegations of sexual misconduct in his past (which he denies) and questions of his character and truthfulness under oath.

Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich just explained why: If Democrats take back control of the House and try to investigate President Donald Trump, they might subpoena Trump’s tax returns, and Gingrich predicts the fight would go all the way to the Supreme Court.

“We’ll see whether or not the Kavanaugh fight was worth it,” Gingrich said in an interview with the Washington Post. With Kavanaugh’s confirmation, the Supreme Court is the most ideologically conservative it has been in a generation.

House Republicans have tried to tamp down on investigations into Trump and his administration, hoping to keep the drama to a minimum in Congress. Early in Trump’s presidency, Republicans voted down a motion to release Trump’s tax returns to Congress, and Republican-led House committees have tried to spin the special investigation into Trump’s presidential campaign’s alleged ties with Russian nationals into a witch hunt.

Whether Kavanaugh would be a fair check on the executive branch was among Democrats biggest concerns during the Supreme Court hearings earlier this fall — especially when it comes to investigations into the White House and Trump himself.

Democrats’ concern stemmed from a 2009 article for the Minnesota Law Review in which Kavanaugh writes that Congress should exempt sitting presidents from criminal prosecution.

“I believe that the president should be excused from some of the burdens of ordinary citizenship while serving in office,” Kavanaugh writes. “We should not burden a sitting president with civil suits, criminal investigations, or criminal prosecutions.”

There’s no question that if Democrats take back of control of the House, investigating the president and his administration would be a top priority — calling for his tax returns among them. The Democratic 2018 midterms message has been focused on anti-corruption, and House Democrats have already presented a plan to hold Trump accountable.

Kavanaugh was part of the independent counsel tasked with investigating the death of deputy White House counsel Vince Foster in 1994 — part of a conservative conspiracy that Foster was murdered rather than committed suicide. He went on to work in George W. Bush’s White House counsel office.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters