Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Companies who donated to Republicans made sure the tax cuts looked helpful for workers

There were both economic and political motivations behind all those bonus announcements.

President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

Right after the Republican tax cut bill passed a year ago, corporations made a slew of announcements pegged to the legislation, including some that gave workers one-time bonuses.

It turns out that companies making such announcements were likelier to have a history of donating to Republicans.

A recent working paper from researchers at MIT, the University of North Carolina, and the University of Michigan analyzed corporate actions following the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the first three months of 2018. One of the items they looked at was how the tax cuts affected companies’ public announcements of new benefits for their workers, examining nearly 200 tax cuts-related announcements made in the first quarter of 2018.

Their findings: Companies with larger expected tax savings were likelier to announce a boost for workers. So were companies with political action committees that donate to Republicans more than Democrats.

In other words, there appear to have been some economic and political calculations involved. Some companies were passing savings on to their employees, and some also appeared to have been sending a bit of a thank-you note to the GOP.

“We did find evidence that the firms whose PACs donated more to Republicans were also more likely to make these announcements,” Jeffrey Hoopes, an assistant professor of accounting at the University of North Carolina’s Kanan-Flagler Business School and one of the researchers behind the paper, said.

He cautioned that it doesn’t mean it’s necessarily “nefarious messaging” on behalf of corporations: “It could be that if you’re a Republican CEO, when tax reform comes and it’s going to help your business — when it came, you helped your employees.”

Companies that donated to Republicans were happy to make tax cuts-related announcements

The paper doesn’t get into deep detail about specific companies that had Republican-donating PACs and made employee benefits announcements, but they’re not hard to find.

Take, for example, Ryder, a transportation and logistics company based in Miami.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the PAC donated about $55,000 to the GOP during the 2016 election cycle, as opposed to $7,000 to Democrats. (Employees can contribute to Ryder’s PAC on a voluntary basis.)

In January 2018, about a month after the tax bill passed, Ryder announced that it would pay a one-time cash bonus to employees totaling $23 million. It attributed the decision to the tax bill, which reduced the corporate tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent.

To be sure, a bonus is not the same as a wage increase; it’s a one-time boost, not a benefit employees will enjoy for years.

Ryder rewarded its shareholders, too. Just days later in February 2018, Ryder said it would increase its dividend — the quarterly cash amount it pays to shareholders — to $0.52 per share from $0.46 per share, a 13 percent increase. It also attributed that to the tax cuts.

Ryder has about 53 million outstanding shares, meaning the dividend increase will cost it about an extra $3.2 million each quarter. It will take shareholders less than two years to reach the $23 million bonus paid to workers.

Ryder’s decisions, like many of the companies the researchers examined, likely had both political and economic factors. Ryder’s PAC clearly has a Republican bent and may have been happy to attribute its announcements to the tax bill.

It’s also saving a lot of money under the tax cuts. In a February 2018 earnings announcement, Ryder CEO Robert Sanchez said the company saw a “significant tax benefit to reduce deferred tax liabilities” — meaning it would owe less on taxes that had not yet been paid — and said it expected earnings going forward to grow “due to a significant reduction in our effective income tax rate.”

A Ryder spokesperson pointed to Sanchez’s comments and did not comment further.

It’s been about a year since the tax cuts were passed, and it’s not yet entirely clear how its effects will play out. However, it’s likely that most of the stimulus it will deliver in measures such as growth in corporate earnings, the economy, and wages has already arrived or will soon run out. In other words, many of those bonuses for workers announced after the tax cuts are likely a one-time thing.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters