Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Bill Clinton comes to Al Franken’s defense

“I will be honest — the Franken case, for me, was a difficult case, a hard case.”

U.S. Senate Debates Tax Reform Bill
U.S. Senate Debates Tax Reform Bill
Sen. Al Franken walks through the halls of Congress.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

Sen. Al Franken, who resigned from the Senate in December amid sexual misconduct allegations, has a new high-profile defender: former President Bill Clinton.

“I will be honest — the Franken case, for me, was a difficult case, a hard case,” Clinton said in a PBS NewsHour interview last week, when he was asked how he felt about changing norms and Franken’s resignation from the Senate. “But I — maybe I’m just an old-fashioned person, but it seemed to me that there were 29 women on Saturday Night Live that put out a statement for him, and that the first and most fantastic story was called, I believe, into question.”

Franken resigned from his post in the Senate last year after eight women came forward with allegations of sexual misconduct, which included accusations of groping and forcible kissing by the lawmaker. Clinton’s comments seemed to suggest that Franken should have stayed in the Senate and had his fate decided by the next election.

“Too late to wade into it now. I mean, I think it’s a grievous thing to take away from the people a decision they have made, especially when there is an election coming up again,” Clinton said. “But it’s done now.”

Clinton’s comments are the latest evidence that the Democratic Party is continuing to wrestle with the Franken case, which, as Vox’s Laura McGann wrote in May, remains controversial in some parts of the party. Democrats appear interested in holding themselves to a higher standard than Republicans but are torn about that decision after it affected one of their rising stars.

The PBS interview is among the latest in a string of media appearances the former president has made in recent weeks. What began under the auspices of a book tour to promote a new novel from Clinton and writer James Patterson has rapidly evolved into an interrogation of Clinton’s past behavior and current approach toward the #MeToo movement, including Clinton’s pushback against Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s statement that he should have resigned after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

I think it’s a good thing that we should all have higher standards,” Clinton added in his PBS interview. “I think the norms have really changed in terms of what you can do to somebody against their will, how much you can crowd their space, make them miserable at work.”

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters